1887

Abstract

Two species of the genus , namely Andersen 1993 and Holmes 1993, were simultaneously proposed and described in the same volume of , and have been maintained as heterotypic homonyms. However, the identical 16S rRNA gene sequence and high (99.1 %) average nucleotide identity (ANI) between the genome sequences of the two type strains implied that these two taxa should be united as a single genomic species. To clarify their taxonomic status, phenotypic properties including enzymic activities and substrate-utilization profiles were investigated. The results demonstrated that the two taxa have no pronounced differences and should constitute a single species. Therefore, the reclassification of Andersen 1993 as a later heterotypic synonym of Holmes 1993 is proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.070664-0
2015-02-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/65/2/463.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.070664-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersen B. M., Steigerwalt A. G., O’Connor S. P., Hollis D. G., Weyant R. S., Weaver R. E., Brenner D. J.. ( 1993;). Neisseria weaveri sp. nov., formerly CDC group M-5, a Gram-negative bacterium associated with dog bite wounds. . J Clin Microbiol 31:, 2456–2466.[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auch A. F., von Jan M., Klenk H. P., Göker M.. ( 2010;). Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. . Stand Genomic Sci 2:, 117–134. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Goris J., Konstantinidis K. T., Klappenbach J. A., Coenye T., Vandamme P., Tiedje J. M.. ( 2007;). DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:, 81–91. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Holmes B., Costas M., On S. L., Vandamme P., Falsen E., Kersters K.. ( 1993;). Neisseria weaveri sp. nov. (formerly CDC group M-5), from dog bite wounds of humans. . Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:, 687–693. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim M., Oh H. S., Park S. C., Chun J.. ( 2014;). Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:, 346–351. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Konstantinidis K. T., Tiedje J. M.. ( 2005;). Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:, 2567–2572. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A.. (editors) ( 1992;). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Washington, DC:: American Society for Microbiology;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Richter M., Rosselló-Móra R.. ( 2009;). Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:, 19126–19131. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yi H., Cho Y. J., Yoon S. H., Park S. C., Chun J.. ( 2012a;). Comparative genomics of Neisseria weaveri clarifies the taxonomy of this species and identifies genetic determinants that may be associated with virulence. . FEMS Microbiol Lett 328:, 100–105. [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yi H., Cho Y. J., Yoon S. H., Park S. C., Chun J.. ( 2012b;). Neisseria weaveri Andersen et al. 1993 pro. synon. Neisseria weaveri Holmes et al. 1993. In Notification of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion Previously Published Outside the IJSEM. List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion no. 16. . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:, 1448–1449. [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.070664-0
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error