Reclassification of rhizosphere bacteria including strains causing corky root of lettuce and proposal of Rhizorhapis suberifaciens gen. nov., comb. nov., Sphingobium mellinum sp. nov., Sphingobium xanthum sp. nov. and Rhizorhabdus argentea gen. nov., sp. nov.

References

1. Balkwill D. L., Fredrickson J. K., Romine M. F. ( 2006 ). Sphingomonas and related genera. . In The Prokaryotes: a Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, vol. 7, pp. 605–629. Edited by Dworkin M., Falkow S., Rosenberg E., Schleifer K.H., Stackebrandt E. . New York:: Springer;. [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brown P. R., Michelmore R. W. ( 1988 ). The genetics of corky root resistance in lettuce. . Phytopathology 78, 1145–1150. [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chen H., Jogler M., Rohde M., Klenk H.-P., Busse H.-J., Tindall B. J., Spröer C., Overmann J. ( 2013 ). Sphingobium limneticum sp. nov. and Sphingobium boeckii sp. nov., two freshwater planktonic members of the family Sphingomonadaceae, and reclassification of Sphingomonas suberifaciens as Sphingobium suberifaciens comb. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63, 735–743. [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Datnoff L. E., Nagata R. T. ( 1990 ). Isolation of Rhizomonas suberifaciens in Florida. . Plant Dis 74, 394. [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Ley J. ( 1970 ). Reexamination of the association between melting point, buoyant density, and chemical base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid. . J Bacteriol 101, 738–754.[PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. De Ley J., Van Muylem J. ( 1963 ). Some applications of deoxyribonucleic acid base composition in bacterial taxonomy. . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 29, 344–358. [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Vos P., Trüper H. G. ( 2000 ). Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology IXth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the meetings, 14, 15 and 18 August 1999, Sydney, Australia. . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 2239–2244. [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dees S. B., Moss C. W., Weaver R. E., Hollis D. ( 1979 ). Cellular fatty acid composition of Pseudomonas paucimobilis and groups IIk-2, Ve-1, and Ve-2. . J Clin Microbiol 10, 206–209.[PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Felsenstein J. ( 1985 ). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. . Evolution 39, 783–791. [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gascuel O. ( 1997 ). bionj: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. . Mol Biol Evol 14, 685–695. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gevers D., Cohan F. M., Lawrence J. G., Spratt B. G., Coenye T., Feil E. J., Stackebrandt E., Van de Peer Y., Vandamme P. & other authors ( 2005 ). Opinion: Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. . Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 733–739. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gouy M., Guindon S., Gascuel O. ( 2010 ). SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. . Mol Biol Evol 27, 221–224. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Guindon S., Dufayard J. F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. ( 2010 ). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. . Syst Biol 59, 307–321. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hiraishi A., Kuraishi H., Kawahara K. ( 2000 ). Emendation of the description of Blastomonas natatoria (Sly 1985) Sly and Cahill 1997 as an aerobic photosynthetic bacterium and reclassification of Erythromonas ursincola Yurkov et al. 1997 as Blastomonas ursincola comb. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 1113–1118. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Holmes B., Owen R. J., Evans A., Malnick H., Willcox W. R. ( 1977 ). Pseudomonas paucimobilis, a new species isolated from human clinical specimens, the hospital environment, and other sources. . Int J Syst Bacteriol 27, 133–146. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kawahara K., Seydel U., Matsuura M., Danbara H., Rietschel E. T., Zähringer U. ( 1991 ). Chemical structure of glycosphingolipids isolated from Sphingomonas paucimobilis . . FEBS Lett 292, 107–110. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kent W. S. ( 1880 ). A Manual of the Infusoria: Including a Description of All Known Flagellate, Ciliate and Tentaculiferous Protozoa, British and Foreign, and an Account of the Organization and Affinities of the Sponges, vol. I. London:: David Bogue;. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kloesges T., Popa O., Martin W., Dagan T. ( 2011 ). Networks of gene sharing among 329 proteobacterial genomes reveal differences in lateral gene transfer frequency at different phylogenetic depths. . Mol Biol Evol 28, 1057–1074. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lambert M. A., Hickman-Brenner F. W., Farmer J. J. III, Moss C. W. ( 1983 ). Differentiation of Vibrionaceae species by their cellular fatty acid composition. . Int J Syst Bacteriol 33, 777–792. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lambert B., Meire P., Joos H., Lens P., Swings J. ( 1990 ). Fast-growing, aerobic, heterotrophic bacteria from the rhizosphere of young sugar beet plants. . Appl Environ Microbiol 56, 3375–3381.[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Marmur J., Doty P. ( 1962 ). Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. . J Mol Biol 5, 109–118. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Sly L. I., Cahill M. M. ( 1997 ). Transfer of Blastobacter natatorius (Sly 1985) to the genus Blastomonas gen. nov. as Blastomonas natatoria comb. nov.. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 566–568. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Stackebrandt E., Ebers J. ( 2006 ). Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. . Microbiol Today 33, 152–155.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Takeuchi M., Hamana K., Hiraishi A. ( 2001 ). Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu strictu and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1405–1417. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
25. van Bruggen A. H. C., Jochimsen K. N. ( 1992 ). First report of Rhizomonas sp. causing corky root of lettuce in Europe. . Neth J Plant Pathol 98, 45–56. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
26. van Bruggen A. H. C., Jochimsen K. N. ( 1993 ). First report of Rhizomonas suberifaciens causing corky root of lettuce in Australia. . Australas Plant Pathol 22, 14–19. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
27. van Bruggen A. H. C., Grogan R. G., Bogdanoff C. P., Waters C. M. ( 1988 ). Corky root of lettuce in California caused by a Gram-negative bacterium. . Phytopathology 78, 1139–1145. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
28. van Bruggen A. H. C., Brown P. R., Jochimsen K. N. ( 1989 ). Corky root of lettuce caused by strains of a Gram-negative bacterium from muck soils of Florida, New York, and Wisconsin. . Appl Environ Microbiol 55, 2635–2640.[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
29. van Bruggen A. H. C., Jochimsen K. N., Brown P. R. ( 1990 ). Rhizomonas suberifaciens gen. nov., sp. nov., the causal agent of corky root of lettuce. . Int J Syst Bacteriol 40, 175–188. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
30. van Bruggen A. H. C., Jochimsen K. N., Benedict A. A., Pollard L. W. ( 1992 ). Monoclonal antibodies for the detection of Rhizomonas suberifaciens, causal agent of corky root of lettuce, with enzyme immunoassays. . Food Agric Immunol 4, 27–40. [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
31. van Bruggen A. H. C., Jochimsen K. N., Steinberger E. M., Segers P., Gillis M. ( 1993 ). Classification of Rhizomonas suberifaciens, an unnamed Rhizomonas species, and Sphingomonas spp. in rRNA superfamily IV. . Int J Syst Bacteriol 43, 1–7. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Yabuuchi E., Yano I., Oyaizu H., Hashimoto Y., Ezaki T., Yamamoto H. ( 1990 ). Proposals of Sphingomonas paucimobilis gen. nov. and comb. nov., Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis sp. nov., Sphingomonas yanoikuyae sp. nov., Sphingomonas adhaesiva sp. nov., Sphingomonas capsulata comb. nov., and two genospecies of the genus Sphingomonas . . Microbiol Immunol 34, 99–119. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
33. Yabuuchi E., Kosako Y., Naka T., Suzuki S., Yano I. ( 1999 ). Proposal of Sphingomonas suberifaciens (van Bruggen, Jochimsen and Brown 1990) comb. nov., Sphingomonas natatoria (Sly 1985) comb. nov., Sphingomonas ursincola (Yurkov et al. 1997) comb. nov., and emendation of the genus Sphingomonas . . Microbiol Immunol 43, 339–349. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
34. Yabuuchi E., Kosako Y., Fujiwara N., Naka T., Matsunaga I., Ogura H., Kobayashi K. ( 2002 ). Emendation of the genus Sphingomonas Yabuuchi et al. 1990 and junior objective synonymy of the species of three genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, in conjunction with Blastomonas ursincola . . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1485–1496. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
35. Yurkov V., Stackebrandt E., Buss O., Vermeglio A., Gorlenko V., Beatty J. T. ( 1997 ). Reorganization of the genus Erythromicrobium: description of “Erythromicrobium sibiricum” as Sandaracinobacter sibiricus gen. nov., sp. nov., and of “Erythromicrobium ursincola” as Erythromonas ursincola gen. nov., sp. nov.. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 1172–1178. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]