The name Lactobacillus cellobiosus is validly published, but the species is often neglected in taxonomic studies, due to its high similarity to Lactobacillus fermentum. In the present paper, literature data concerning the two species were reviewed. Phylogenetic placement of L. cellobiosus was obtained based on 16S rDNA sequences, and genetic similarity was further investigated by comparing partial recA gene sequences for the type strains of L. cellobiosus and L. fermentum. Based on the high identity values for 16S rDNA (99 %) and recA gene (98 %) sequences, the results of DNA–DNA hybridization assays and phenotypic traits available from the literature, it is proposed that L. cellobiosus be reclassified and, as a rule of priority, renamed as L. fermentum, the first described species.
CollinsM. D.,
RodriguesU. M.,
AshC.,
AguirreM.,
FarrowJ. A. E.,
Martinez-MurciaA.,
PhillipsB. A.,
WilliamsA. M.,
WallbanksS.1991; Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77:5–12[CrossRef]
DellaglioF.,
de RoissartH.,
TorrianiS.,
CurkM. C.,
JanssensD.1994; Caractéristiques générales des bactéries lactiques. In Bactéries Lactiques vol I pp 25–116 Edited by
de RoissartH.,
LuquetF. M.
Uriage, France: Lorica;
FelisG. E.,
DellaglioF.,
MizziL.,
TorrianiS.2001; Comparative sequence analysis of a recA gene fragment brings new evidence for a change in the taxonomy of the Lactobacillus casei group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:2113–2117[CrossRef]
FoxG. E.,
WisotzkeyJ. D.,
JurtshukP.Jr1992; How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. Int J Syst Bacteriol 42:166–170[CrossRef]
HammesW. P.,
VogelR. F.1995; The genus Lactobacillus
. In The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteriavol. 2 pp 19–54 Edited by
WoodB. J. B.,
HolzapfelW. H.
Glasgow: Blackie Academic & Professional;
KandlerO.,
WeissN.1989; Regular, nonsporeforming, Gram-positive rods. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 2 pp 1208–1234 Edited by
SneathP. H. A.,
MairN. S.,
SharpeM. E.,
HoltJ. G.
Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
LapageS. P.,
SneathP. H. A.,
LesselE. F.,
SkermanV. B. D.,
SeelingerH. P. R.,
ClarkW. A.
(editors) 1992; International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision)
. Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
RogosaM.,
HansenP. A.1971; Nomenclatural consideration of certain species of Lactobacillus Beijerinck. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Bacteriol 21:177–186[CrossRef]
RogosaM.,
WisemanR. F.,
MitchellJ. A.,
DisraelyM. N.,
BeamanA. J.1953; Species differentiation of oral lactobacilli from man including descriptions of Lactobacillus salivarius nov. spec. and Lactobacillus cellobiosus nov. spec. J Bacteriol 65:681–699
ThompsonJ. D.,
GibsonT. J.,
PlewniakF.,
JeanmouginF.,
HigginsD. G.1997; The clustal x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882
TorrianiS.,
FelisG. E.,
DellaglioF.2001; Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum , L. pentosus , and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3450–3454[CrossRef]
Van de PeerY.,
De WachterR.1994; treecon for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput Appl Biosci 10:569–570
VescovoM.,
DellaglioF.,
BottazziV.,
SarraP. G.1979; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology among Lactobacillus species of the subgenus Betabacterium Orla-Jensen. Microbiologica 2:317–330