1887

Abstract

In the early 1980s, a facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, short rod, designated 202, was isolated from a chicken crop and identified as a homofermentative lactic acid bacterium. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that the strain was affiliated with the genus , clustering within the group. In this analysis, strain 202 appeared to be most closely related to the type strains of and , with gene sequence similarities of 96.1 and 96.2 %, respectively. Strain 202 was found to differ from these two species, however, when investigated by multilocus sequence analysis, and it also differed in terms of some of its metabolic properties. On the basis of these observations, strain 202 is considered to represent a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed; the type strain is 202 ( = CRBIP 24.85 = DSM 23908).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (Award FP7-228310)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.028217-0
2012-02-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/62/2/330.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.028217-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bernardet J. F., Nakagawa Y., Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes 2002; Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1049–1070[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaiotta G., Fusco V., Ercolini D., Aponte M., Pepe O., Villani F. 2008; Lactobacillus strain diversity based on partial hsp60 gene sequences and design of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assays for species identification and differentiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:208–215 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohak I., Back W., Richter L., Ehrmann M., Ludwig W., Schleifer K. H. 1998; Lactobacillus amylolyticus sp. nov., isolated from beer malt and beer wort. Syst Appl Microbiol 21:360–364 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Champ M., Szylit O., Raibaud P., Aït-Abdelkader N. 1983; Amylase production by three Lactobacillus strains isolated from chicken crop. J Appl Bacteriol 55:487–493 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clermont D., Diard S., Bouchier C., Vivier C., Bimet F., Motreff L., Welker M., Kallow W., Bizet C. 2009; Microbacterium binotii sp. nov., isolated from human blood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:1016–1022 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Edgar R. C. 2004; MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Felsenstein J. 1989; phylip–phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fujisawa T., Shirasaka S., Watabe J., Mitsuoka T. 1984; Lactobacillus aviarius sp. nov.: a new species isolated from the intestines of chickens. Syst Appl Microbiol 5:414–420 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fujisawa T., Itoh K., Benno Y., Mitsuoka T. 1990; Lactobacillus intestinalis (ex Hemme 1974) sp. nov., nom. rev., isolated from the intestines of mice and rats. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:302–304 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujisawa T., Benno Y., Yaeshima T., Mitsuoka T. 1992; Taxonomic study of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group, with recognition of Lactobacillus gallinarum sp. nov. and Lactobacillus johnsonii sp. nov. and synonymy of Lactobacillus acidophilus group A3 (Johnson et al. 1980) with the type strain of Lactobacillus amylovorus (Nakamura 1981). Int J Syst Bacteriol 42:487–491 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gouy M., Guindon S., Gascuel O. 2010; SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27:221–224 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guindon S., Gascuel O. 2003; A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hammes W. P., Hertel C. 2009; Genus Lactobacillus . In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn. pp. 465–511 New York: Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ludwig W., Strunk O., Westram R., Richter L., Meier H., Yadhukumar, Buchner A., Lai T., Steppi S. other authors 2004; ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1363–1371 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mesbah M., Premachandran U., Whitman W. B. 1989; Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:159–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Morishita Y., Mitsuoka T., Kaneuchi C., Yamamoto S., Ogata M. 1971; Specific establishment of lactobacilli in the digestive tract of germ-free chickens. Jpn J Microbiol 15:531–538[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mukai T., Arihara K., Ikeda A., Nomura K., Suzuki F., Ohori H. 2003; Lactobacillus kitasatonis sp. nov., from chicken intestine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:2055–2059 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Naser S. M., Dawyndt P., Hoste B., Gevers D., Vandemeulebroecke K., Cleenwerck I., Vancanneyt M., Swings J. 2007; Identification of lactobacilli by pheS and rpoA gene sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2777–2789 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Néron B., Ménager H., Maufrais C., Joly N., Maupetit J., Letort S., Carrere S., Tuffery P., Letondal C. 2009; Mobyle: a new full web bioinformatics framework. Bioinformatics 25:3005–3011 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Niamsup P., Sujaya I. N., Tanaka M., Sone T., Hanada S., Kamagata Y., Lumyong S., Assavanig A., Asano K. other authors 2003; Lactobacillus thermotolerans sp. nov., a novel thermotolerant species isolated from chicken faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:263–268 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Raibaud P., Galpin J. V., Ducluzeau R., Mocquot G., Oliver G. 1973; Le genre dans le tube digestif du rat. I. Caractères des souches homofermentaires isolées de rats holo- et gnotoxéniques. Ann Microbiol 124:83–109 (in French)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharpe M. E. 1979; Identification of lactic acid bacteria. In Identification Methods for Microbiologists (Society for Applied Bacteriology. Technical Series no 14), 2nd edn. Edited by Skinner F. A., Lovelock D. W. New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Song L., James S. R., Kazim L., Karpf A. R. 2005; Specific method for the determination of genomic DNA methylation by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 77:504–510 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stackebrandt E., Goebel B. M. 1994; Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:846–849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yarza P., Richter M., Peplies J., Euzéby J., Amann R., Schleifer K. H., Ludwig W., Glöckner F. O., Rosselló-Móra R. 2008; The All-Species Living Tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 31:241–250 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.028217-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.028217-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error