With reference to the first Principle of the , which emphasizes stability of names, it is proposed that the original adjectival form of the specific epithet be conserved in the reclassification of to the new genus . Thus, Sakamoto . 2002 should be Sakamoto . 2002 corrig., gen. nov., comb. nov., and we put forward a Request for an Opinion to the Judicial Commission regarding this correction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. editors 1992 International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Paster B. J., Dewhirst F. E., Olsen I., Fraser G. J. 1994; Phylogeny of Bacteroides , Prevotella , and Porphyromonas spp. and related bacteria. J Bacteriol 176:725–732
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sakamoto M., Suzuki M., Umeda M., Ishikawa I., Benno Y. 2002; Reclassification of Bacteroides forsythus (Tanner et al . 1986) as Tannerella forsythensis corrig., gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:841–849 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tanner A. C. R., Listgarten M. A., Ebersole J. L., Strzempko M. N. 1986; Bacteroides forsythus sp. nov., a slow-growing, fusiform Bacteroides sp. from the human oral cavity. Int J Syst Bacteriol 36:213–221 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error