The taxonomic position of a Gram-positive, non-spore-forming strain, designated CAU 59T, from activated sludge was investigated. Colony morphology, biochemical tests and chemotaxonomic investigations revealed that strain CAU 59T possessed the characteristics of the genus Pseudoclavibacter. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed sequence divergence values between strain CAU 59T and other described Pseudoclavibacter species of more than 3.6 %, and the strain formed a hitherto-unknown subline within the genus Pseudoclavibacter. DNA–DNA hybridization studies showed that strain CAU 59T displayed 20.9 % relatedness to its closest phylogenetic neighbour, Pseudoclavibacter helvolus DSM 20419T. The DNA G+C content was 66.2 mol%. The phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic data indicated that strain CAU 59T represents a novel species of the genus Pseudoclavibacter, for which the name Pseudoclavibacter chungangensis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is CAU 59T (=KCTC 22691T =CCUG 58142T).
BehrendtU.,
UlrichA.,
SchumannP.,
NaumannD.,
SuzukiK.2002; Diversity of grass-associated Microbacteriaceae isolated from the phyllosphere and litter layer after mulching the sward; polyphasic characterization of Subtercola pratensis sp.nov., Curtobacterium herbarum sp. nov. and Plantibacter flavus gen. nov.,sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1441–1454[CrossRef]
ChunJ.,
LeeJ. H.,
JungY.,
KimM.,
KimS.,
KimB. K.,
LimY. W.2007; EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2259–2261[CrossRef]
CollinsM. D.,
BradburyJ. F.1992; The genera Agromyces, Aureobacterium, Clavibacter, Curtobacterium, and Microbacterium
. In The Prokaryotes, 2nd edn. pp 1355–1368 Edited by
BalowsA.,
TrüperH. G.,
DworkinM.,
HarderW.,
SchleiferK. H.
New York: Springer;
CollinsM. D.,
JonesD.1981; The distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implications. Microbiol Rev 45:316–354
DoetschR. N.1981; Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology
. pp 21–33 Edited by
GerhardtP.,
MurrayR. G. E.,
CostilowR. N.,
NesterE. W.,
WoodW. A.,
KriegN. R.,
PhillipsG. H.
Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
EvtushenkoL. I.,
TakeuchiM.2003; The family Microbacteriaceae . In The Prokaryotes: a Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria
. , 3rd edn. vol 3 pp 1020–1098 Edited by
DworkinM.,
FalkowS.,
RosenbergE.,
SchleiferK. H.,
StackebrandtE.
New York: Springer;
EzakiT.,
HashimotoY.,
YabuuchiE.1989; Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:224–229[CrossRef]
GonzalezJ. M.,
Saiz-JimenezC.2002; A fluorimetric method for the estimation of G+C mol% content in microorganisms by thermal denaturation temperature. Environ Microbiol 4:770–773[CrossRef]
GorisJ.,
SuzukiK.,
De VosP.,
NakaseT.,
KerstersK.1998; Evaluation of a microplate DNA–DNA hybridization method compared with the initial renaturation method. Can J Microbiol 44:1148–1153[CrossRef]
GrothI.,
SchumannP.,
WeissN.,
MartinK.,
RaineyF. A.1996; Agrococcus jenensis gen. nov., sp. nov. a new genus of actinomycetes with diaminobutyric acid in the cell wall. Int J Syst Bacteriol 46:234–239[CrossRef]
JukesT. H.,
CantorC. R.1969; Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolismvol. 3 pp 21–132 Edited by
MunroH. N.
New York: Academic Press;
LinY.-C.,
UemoriK.,
de BrielD. A.,
ArunpairojanaV.,
YokotaA.2004Zimmermannella helvola gen. nov., sp. nov., Zimmermannella alba sp. nov., Zimmermannella bifida sp. nov., Zimmermannella faecalis sp. nov. and Leucobacter albus sp. nov., novel members of the family Microbacteriaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1669–1676 [CrossRef]
LochheadA. G.1995; Brevibacterium helvolum (Zimmermann) comb. nov. Int Bull Bact Nomen Taxon 5: 115
ManaiaC. M.,
NunesO. C.,
NogalesB.2003; Caenibacterium thermophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. isolated from a thermophilic aerobic digester of municipal sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1375–1382[CrossRef]
ManaiaC. M.,
NogalesB.,
WeissN.,
NunesO. C.2004; Gulosibacter molinativorax gen. nov., sp. nov., a molinate-degrading bacterium, and classification of ‘ Brevibacterium helvolum ’ DSM 20419 as Pseudoclavibacter helvolus gen. nov., sp. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:783–789[CrossRef]
MinnikinD. E.,
HutchinsonI. G.,
CaldicottA. B.,
GoodfellowM.1980; Thin-layer chromatography of methanolysates of mycolic acid-containing bacteria. J Chromatogr A 188:221–233[CrossRef]
SheridanP. P.,
Loveland-CurtzeJ.,
MitevaV. I.,
BrenchleyJ. E.2003; Rhodoglobus vestalii gen. nov., sp. nov. a novel psychrophilic organism isolated from an Antarctic Dry Valley lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:985–994[CrossRef]
SmibertR. M.,
KriegN. R.1981; General characterization. In Manual of Methods for General Microbiology pp 409–443 Edited by
GerhardtP.,
MurrayR. G. E.,
CostilowR. N.,
NesterE. W.,
WoodW. A.,
KriegN. R.,
PhillipsG. B.
Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
SmibertR. M.,
KriegN. R.1994; Phenotypic characterization. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology
. pp 607–654 Edited by
GerhardtP.,
MurrayR. G. E.,
WoodW. A.,
KriegN. R.
Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
StackebrandtE.,
GoebelB. M.1994; Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:846–849[CrossRef]
ThompsonJ. D.,
GibsonT. J.,
PlewniakF.,
JeanmouginF.,
HigginsD. G.1997; The clustal_x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882[CrossRef]
WayneL. G.,
BrennerD. J.,
ColwellR. R.,
GrimontP. A. D.,
KandlerO.,
KrichevskyM. I.,
MooreL. H.,
MooreW. E. C.,
MurrayR. G. E.other authors1987; International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464[CrossRef]
ZimmermannO. E. R.1890; Die Bakterien unserer Trink- und Nutzwasser, inabesondere des Wassers der Chemnitzer Wasserleitung. pp 53–154 Eleventh Report Naturwiss Ges Chemnitz;