The specific epithet is conserved against in the species name (Schroeter) Warren and Scott 1930 with basionym Schroeter 1886.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Eberth C. J. 1880; Die Organismen in den Organen bei Typhus abdominalis. Arch. f. path. Anat. 81.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Klebs E. 1880; Handbuch d. path. Anat. Lieferung 7, bearb. von Prof. Eppinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Zopf W. 1884; Die Spaltpilze. Z. Aufl., Breslau, Anhang. 90
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zopf W. 1885; Die Spaltpilze. 3. Aufl., Breslau. 125
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Flugge C. 1886; Die Mikroorganismen. 2. Aufl. 198
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schroeter J. 1886; In: Cohn, Kryptogamen-Flora von Schlesien. 3:165. Erste Hälfte, Abt. 2, U. Kern’s Verlag, Breslau.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Warren S. H., Scott W. M. 1930; A new serological type of Salmonella. Jour. Hyg. 29:415–417
    [Google Scholar]
  8. White P. Bruce. 1930; Notes on organisms serologically related to S. enteritidis Gärtner I. The Dublin and Tokyo types of Salmonella. Jour. Hyg. 29:443–445
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Breed R. S. 1955; Salmonella typhosa versus Salmonella typhi. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 5:165–168
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Editorial Board 1958; Status of proposed draft of Opinion 18. Legitimacy of the specific epithets typhosa and typhi as used in the species names Salmonella typhosa and Salmonella typhi. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:155–157
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error