1887

Abstract

β-Haemolytic, Lancefield group within the anginosus-species group were shown by genetic and phenotypic criteria to be heterogeneous and to constitute two distinct taxa related at subspecies level to and , respectively. The first group, referred to here as DNA group 1, comprised six strains with 86–100% intragroup overall genomic DNA relatedness; five of the strains were originally isolated from the human throat and one was from an abdominal mass. They shared 61–77% DNA relatedness (Δ values = 1.2-1.5 °C) with reference strains of and were clearly differentiated from (now named subsp. ) by the ability to produce β-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, β-acetylglucosaminidase, β--fucosidase, β--galactosidase and β--glucosidase. The name subsp. is proposed for these strains on the grounds that they are genetically and phenotypically distinct and exhibit a predeliction for the human throat, being isolated also from cases of pharyngitis. The DNA G+C content is 35–37 mol%. The type strain is MM9889a (= NCTC 13122). The second group (DNA group 2) was formed by five β-haemolytic, Lancefield group C strains originally isolated from various human infections. DNA group 2 strains (81–100% intragroup DNA relatedness) shared 60–72% DNA relatedness (Δ values = 2.1-4.1 C) with strains NCTC 10713 and MAS 283 but were not dearly differentiated phenotypically from , showed no dear pattern of clinical association, and therefore are not formally proposed as a new subspecies here.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1443
1999-10-01
2024-12-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/49/4/ijs-49-4-1443.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1443&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmet Z., Warren M., Houang E. T. 1995; Species identification of members of the Streptococcus milleri group isolated from the vagina by ID 32 Strep System and differential phenotypic testing. J Clin Microbiol 33:1592–1595
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beighton D., Hardie J. M., Whiley R. A. 1991; A scheme for the identification of viridans streptococci. J Med Microbiol 35:367–372
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergman S., Selig M. S., Collins M. D., Farrow J. A. E., Baron E. J., Dickersin G. R., Ruoff K. L. 1995; Streptococcus milleri’ strains displaying a gliding type of motility. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:235–239
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner D. J. 1978; Characterization and clinical identification of Enterobacteriaceae by DNA hybridization. Prog Clin Pathol 7:71–117
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cookson B., Talsania S., Chinn S., Phillips I. 1989; A qualitative and quantitative study of the cellular fatty acids of ‘Streptococcus milleri’ with capillary gas chromatography. J Gen Microbiol 135:831–838
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Doitt C, Grimont F., Whiley R. A., Regnault B., Grimont P. A. D., Hardie J. M., Bouvet A. 1994 Ribotypes of the ‘Streptococcus milleri-gycnxp’ allow discrimination between strains of Streptococcus constellatus. Streptococcus intermedius and Streptococcus anginosus. Pathogenic Streptococci Present and Future531–532 Edited by Totolian A. St Petersburg, Russia: Lancer Publications;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox K., Turner J., Fox A. 1993; Role of beta-hemolytic streptococci in pharyngitis: incidence and biochemical characteristics of Streptococcus equisimilis and Streptococcus anginosus in patients and healthy controls. J Clin Microbiol 31:804–807
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Garvie E. I. 1976; Hybridization between the deoxyribonucleic acid of some strains of hetero-fermentative lactic acid bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 26:166–122
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grimont P. A. D. 1988; Use of DNA reassociation in bacterial classification. Can J Microbiol 34:541–546
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobs J. A., Pietersen H. G., Stobberingh E. E., Soeters P. B. 1995; Streptococcus anginosus. Streptococcus constellatus and Streptococcus intermedius. Clinical relevance, hemolytic and serologic characteristics. Am J Clin Pathol 104:547–553
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kawamura Y., Hou X.-G., Sultana F., Miura H., Ezaki T. 1995; Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:406–408
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kilpper-Balz R., Williams B. L., Luttiken R., Schleifer K. H. 1984; Relatedness of ‘ Streptococcus milleri’ with Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus. Syst Appl Microbiol 5:494–500
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A.editors 1992 International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lawrence J., Yuko D. M., Hadley W. K. 1985; Incidence and characterization of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus milleri and differentiation from S. pyogenes (group A), S. equisimilis (group C). and large-colony group C streptococci. J Clin Microbiol22
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marmur J., Doty P. 1962; Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J Mol Biol 5:109–118
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith R. F., Willet N. P. 1968; Rapid plate method for screening hyaluronidase- and chondroitin sulfatase-producing microorganisms. Appl Microbiol 16:1434–1436
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Vance D. W. 1992; Group C streptococci: ‘Streptococcus equisimilis’ or Streptococcus anginosus?. Clin Infect Dis 14:616
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Vandamme P., Torek U., Falsen E., Pot B., Goosens H., Kersters K. 1998; Whole-cell protein electrophoretic analysis of viridans streptococci: evidence for heterogeneity among Streptococcus mitis biovars. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:117–125
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R.9 other authors 1987; International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Whiley R. A., Beighton D. 1991; Emended descriptions and recognition of Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus intermedius and Streptococcus anginosus as distinct species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41:1–5
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Whiley R. A., Hardie J. M. 1989; DNA-DNA hybridization studies and phenotypic characterization of strains within the ‘Streptococcus milleri group’. J Gen Microbiol 135:2623–2633
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Whiley R. A., Beighton D., Winstanley T. G., Fraser H. Y., Hardie J. M. 1992; Streptococcus intermedius. Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus (the Streptococcus milleri group): association with different body sites and clinical infections. J Clin Microbiol 30:243–244
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Whiley R. A., Duke B., Hardie J. M., Hall L. M. C. 1995; Heterogeneity among 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacers of species within the ‘Streptococcus milleri group’. Microbiology 141:1461–1467
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Whiley R. A., Hall L M. G, Hardie J. M., Beighton D. 1997; Genotypic and phenotypic diversity within Streptococcus anginosus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:645–650
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Willcox M. D. P. 1995; Potential pathogenic properties of the ‘Streptococcus milleri’ group in relation to the production of endocarditis and abscesses. J Med Microbiol 43:405–410
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Willcox M. D. P., Patrikakis M., Loo C Y., Knox K. W. 1993; Albumin binding proteins on the surface of the Streptococcus milleri group and characterization of the albumin receptor of Streptococcus intermedius. J Gen Microbiol 139:2451–2458
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Winstanley T. G., Magee J. T., Limb D. I., Hindmarch J. M., Spencer R. C., Whiley R. A., Beighton D., Hardie J. M. 1992; A numerical taxonomic study of the ‘Streptococcus milleri’ group based upon conventional phenotypic tests and pyrolysis mass spectrometry. J Med Microbiol 36:149–155
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1443
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1443
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error