1887

Abstract

A phylogenetic investigation of the ascomycetous yeast genus was performed by using 18S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Comparative sequence analysis revealed the genus to be phylogenetically heterogeneous. The five varieties of [var. , var. , var. (type), var. and var. ] were found to have identical 18S rRNA gene sequences and formed a distinct group, quite separate from all other and non- species examined. was found to be the closest phylogenetic relative to the group, however a sequence divergence of approximately 2·3% suggests this species may belong to separate genus. The recently described species was found to exhibit a relatively close association with (= ), the type species of the genus The remaining two members of the genus, and , were found to form distinct lineages, displaying no specific association with any other or non- species. Based on comparative analysis of 18S rRNA genes it is apparent that the genus as presently constituted is not monophyletic, and that the five currently recognized species form separate sublines each potentially worthy of separate generic status. The genus should be restricted to the type species and its five varieties. Despite the five varieties of being genealogically indistinguishable at the 18S rRNA gene level, sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region revealed that the five varieties could be differentiated on both their ITS1 and their ITS2 sequences, providing further evidence of the value of ITS sequences for discrimination of yeasts at the subspecies level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-2-591
1998-04-01
2024-07-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/48/2/ijsem-48-2-591.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-2-591&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Babjeva I. P., Reshetova I. S. 1979; Williopsis pratensis, a new soil yeast species. In Russian Mikrobiologiya 48:1040–1043
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnett J. A., Payne R. W., Yarrow D. 1990 Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification, 2nd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Felsenstein J. 1985; Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Felsenstein J. 1993; phylip: Phylogenetic Inference Package, version 3.5. Seattle: University of Washington;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng D. F., Doolittle R. F. 1987; Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J Mol Evol 35351–360
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Genetics Computer Group 1991; Program manual for the GCG package, version 7. Genetics Computer Group; Madison, WI, USA:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hinzelin F., Kurtzman C. P., Smith M. T. 1991; Williopsis salicorniae sp. nov. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 59:125–127
    [Google Scholar]
  8. James S. A., Collins M. D., Roberts I. N. 1994; Genetic interrelationship among species of the genus Zygosaccharomyces as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Yeast 10:871–881
    [Google Scholar]
  9. James S. A., Collins M. D., Roberts I. N. 1996; Use of an rRNA internal transcribed spacer region to distinguish phylogenetically closely related species of the genera Zygosaccharomyces and Torulaspora. Int J Syst Bacterial 46:189–194
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kurtzman C. P. 1991; DNA relatedness among saturn-spored yeasts assigned to the genera Williopsis and Pichia. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 60:13–19
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu Z., Kurtzman C. P. 1991; Phylogenetic relationships among species of Williopsis and Saturnospora gen. nov. as determined from partial rRNA sequences. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 60:21–30
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mankin A. S., Skryabin K. G., Rubstov P. M. 1986; Identification of ten additional nucleotides in the primary structure of yeast 18S rRNA. Gene 44:143–145
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MUller H. B., Kock J. L. F. 1987; Waltiozyma gen. nov. (Saccharomycetaceae), a new genus of the Endomycetales. S Afr J Sci 82:491–492
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yamada Y., Maeda K., Mikata K. 1994; The phylogenetic relationships of the hat-shaped ascospore-forming, nitrateassimilating Pichia species, formerly classified in the genus Hansenula Sydow et Sydow, based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae): the proposals of three new genera, Ogataea, Kuraishia, and Nakazawaea. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:1245–1257
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yamada Y., Matsuda M., Maeda K., Sakakibara C., Mikata K. 1994; The phylogenetic relationships of the saturn-shaped ascospore-forming species of the genus Williopsis Zender and related genera based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae): the proposal of Komagataea gen. nov. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 58:1236–1244
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamada Y., Yano J., Matsuda M., Higashi T., Mikata K. 1995; The phylogeny of Williopsis salicorniae Hinzelin, Kurtzman et Smith based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs (Saccharomycetaceae). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:945–948
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-2-591
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-2-591
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error