1887

Abstract

Over a five-year period, four strains of a yellowish-pigmented coryneform bacterium were received for identification by the Culture Collection of the University of Géteborg. All strains had been isolated from normally sterile human body fluids. Initial biochemical characterization revealed that all four isolates were very similar, with weak pyrazinamidase and urease activities, as well as slow fermentative acid production from glucose as the most significant phenotypic features which differentiated the strains from all other presently defined corynebacteria. Chemotaxonomic investigations demonstrated that the strains belonged to the genus . SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins suggested that all four strains were representatives of the same species. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis unambiguously demonstrated that the four strains were genealogically related and represent a new subline within the genus for which the designation sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of is CCUG 33651.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-1-69
1998-01-01
2022-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/48/1/ijs-48-1-69.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-1-69&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. API System 1989 API CORYNE analytical profile index. , 1. La-Balme-les-Grottes; France : API System:
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies D. 1984; A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12:387–395
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Felsenstein J. 1989; phylip - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Funke G., Alvarez N., Pascual C., Falsen E., Akervall E., Sabbe L., Schouls L., Weiss N., Collins M. D. 1997; Actinomyces europaeus sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:687–692
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Funke G., Efstratiou A., Kuklinska D., Hutson R. A., de Zoysa A., Engler K. H., Collins M. D. 1997; Corynebacterium imitans sp. nov. isolated from patients with suspected diphtheria. J Clin Microbiol 35:1978–1983
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Funke G., Hutson R. A., Hilleringmann M., Heizmann W. R., Collins M. D. 1997; Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum sp. nov. isolated from a patient with bacterial vaginosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 150:219–224
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Funke G., Lawson P. A., Collins M. D. 1997; Corynebacterium mucifaciens sp. nov., an unusual species from human clinical material. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:952–957
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Funke G., Martinetti Lucchini G., Pfyffer G. E., Marchiania M., von Graevenitz A. 1993; Characteristics of CDC group 1 and group 1-like coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 31:2907–2912
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Funke G., Pascual Ramos C., Collins M. D. 1997; Corynebacterium coyleae sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:92–96
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Funke G., von Graevenitz A., III. Clarridge J. E., Bernard K. A. 1997; Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:125–159
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutson R. A., Thompson D. E., Collins M. D. 1993; Genetic interrelationships of saccharolytic Clostridium botulinum types B, E and F and related Clostridia as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 108:103–110
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nash P., Krenz M. M. 1991 Culture media. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology pp 1226–1288 Balows A., Hausler W. J., Herrmann K. L. Jr, Isenberg H. D., Shadomy H. J. Washington, DC: American Society for Micro-biology;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 1997 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretive standards (µg/ml) for organisms other than Haemophilus. NCCLS documentM7–A4 Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pascual C., Lawson P. A., Farrow J. A. E., Navarro Gimenez M., Collins M. D. 1995; Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Corynebacterium based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:724–728
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Pot B., Vandamme P., Kersters K. 1994 Analysis of electrophoretic whole-organism protein fingerprints. In Modern Microbial Methods. Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics pp 493–521 Goodfellow M., O’Donnell A. G. Chichester: Wiley;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Riegel P., Heller R., Prevost G., Jehl F., Monteil H. 1997; Corynebacterium durum sp. nov., from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:1107–1111
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ruimy R., Riegel P., Boiron P., Monteil H., Christen R. 1995; Phylogeny of the genus Corynebacterium deduced from analyses of small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:740–746
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  19. von Graevenitz A., Funke G. 1996; An identification scheme for rapidly and aerobically growing gram-positive rods. Zentralbl Bakteriol 284:246–254
    [Google Scholar]
  20. von Graevenitz A., Osterhout G., Dick J. 1991; Grouping of some clinically relevant gram-positive rods by automated fatty acid analysis. APMIS 99:147–154
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-1-69
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-48-1-69
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error