Reexamination of Yeast Strains Classified as (Lindner) Free

Abstract

Twenty-eight yeast strains presumed to represent were analyzed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR analysis. Four strains (HUT 7161, IFO 1138, IFO 1145, and IFO 1956) that were considerably different from the type strain were further investigated. Morphological and physiological characteristics revealed that strains HUT 7161 and IFO 1145 belong to the genus rather than the genus , and the former strain may represent Strains IFO 1138 and IFO 1956 were classified as either or by identification keys involving physiological tests. On the basis of analysis of the sequences of two rRNA internal spacer regions, strains IFO 1138 and IFO 1956 were closely related to and strains HUT 7161 and IFO 1145 were outside members of the genera , and

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-47-4-1102
1997-10-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/47/4/ijs-47-4-1102.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-47-4-1102&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baleiras Couto M. M., Hartog B. J., Huisin’t Veld J. H. J., Hofstra H., van der Vossen J. M. B. M. 1996; Identification of spoilage yeasts in a food-production chain by microsatellite polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting. Food Microbiol 13:59–67
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnett J. A. 1992; The taxonomy of the genus Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess: a short review for non-taxonomists. Yeast 8:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnett J. A., Payne R. W., Yarrow D. 1990 Yeast: characteristics and identification, 2nd. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, United Kingdom.:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benítez T., Del Castillo L., Aguilera A., Conde J., Cerda-Olmedo E. 1983; Selection of wine yeast for growth and fermentation in the presence of ethanol and sucrose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:1429–1436
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bostock A., Khattak M. N., Matthews R., Burnie J. 1993; Comparison of PCR fingerprinting, by random amplification of polymorphic DNA, with other molecular typing methods for Candida albicans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:2179–2184
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Felsenstein J. 1993 PHYLIP (Phylogenetic Inference Package) version 3.5c. Department of Genetics; University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fukunaga M., Hamase A. 1995; Outer surface protein C gene sequence analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolates of Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2415–2420
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hansen E. C. 1883; Underspgelser over alkoholgjaersvampenes fysiologi ogmorfologi. II. Om askosporedannelsen hos slaegten Saccharomyces. Medd. Carlsberg Lab. 2:29–86
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Higgines D. G., Bleasby A. K., Fuchs R. 1992; CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189–191
    [Google Scholar]
  10. James S. A., Collins M. D., Roberts I. N. 1996; Use of an rRNA internal transcribed spacer region to distinguish phylogenetically closely related species of the genera Zygosaccharomyces and Torulaspora. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:189–194
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lieckfeldt E., Meyer W., Borner T. 1993; Rapid identification and differentiation of yeasts by DNA and PCR fingerprinting. J. Basic Microbiol. 33:413–426
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindner P. 1895 Mikroskopische Betriebskontrolle in den Garungsgewerben. P. Parey; Berlin, Germany.:
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lodder J., Kreger-van Rij N. J. W. 1952 The yeasts: a taxonomic study. North-Holland Publishing Co.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.:
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Messner R., Prillinger H., Altmann F., Lopandic K., Wimmer K., Molnar O., Weigang F. 1994; Molecular characterization and application of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Mrakia and Sterigmatomyces species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44:694–703
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Molnar O., Messner R., Prillinger H., Stahl U., Slavikova E. 1995; Genotypic identification of Saccharomyces species using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 18:136–145
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Oda Y., Tonomura K. 1995; Electrophoretic karyotyping of the yeast genus Torulaspora. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 21:190–193
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohshima Y., Sugaura T., Horita M., Sasaki T. 1987; Industrial application of artificially induced diploid strains of Torulaspora delbrueckii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:1512–1514
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Price C. W., Fuson G. B., Phaff H. J. 1978; Genome comparison in yeast systematics: delimitation of species within the genera Schwanniomyces, Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces, and Pichia. Microbiol. Rev. 42:161–193
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:161–193
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Valente P., Gouveia F. C., de Lemos G. A., Pimentel D., van Elsas J. D., Mendonya-Hagler L. C., Hagler A. N. 1996; PCR amplification of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer region for differentiation of Saccharomyces cultures. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 137:253–256
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van der Walt J. P. 1970 Saccharomyces emend. Reess. 555–718 Lodder J.ed The yeasts–a taxonomic study, 2nd. Elsevier Science Publishers; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.:
    [Google Scholar]
  22. van der Walt J. P., Johannsen E. 1975; The genus Torulaspora Lindner. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. Res. Rep. Pretoria 325:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vaughan-Martini A., Kurtzman C. P. 1988; Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among species of Saccharomyces sensu lato. Mycologia 80:241–243
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yarrow D. 1984 Saccharomyces Meyen ex Reess. 379–395 Kreger-van Rij N. J. W.ed The yeasts–a taxonomic study, 3rd. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands.:
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-47-4-1102
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-47-4-1102
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed