Genomic Relationship of Five Species of the Genus Chromatium by Analysis of Large Restriction Fragments (Macrorestriction Analysis) Using Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis

References

1. Caumette P., Baulaigue R., Matheron R. 1988; Characterization of Chromatium salexigens sp. nov., an halophilic Chromatiaceae isolated from Mediterranean salinas. Syst. Appl. Microbiol 10:284–292
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cole S. T., Saint Girons I. 1994; Bacterial genomics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 14:139–160
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fowler V. J., Pfennig N., Schubert W., Stackebrandt E. 1984; Towards a phylogeny of phototrophic purple sulfur bacteria—16S rRNA oligonucleotide cataloguing of 11 species of Chromatiaceae. Arch. Microbiol 139:382–387
   [Google Scholar]
4. Gaju N., Guerrero R., Pedrós-Alió C. 1989; Measurement of cell volume of phototrophic bacteria in pure cultures and natural samples: phase contrast, epifluorescence and particle sizing. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 62:295–302
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gaju N., Pavón V., Marín I., Esteve I., Guerrero R., Amils R. 1995; Chromosome map of the phototrophic anoxygenic bacterium Chromatium vinosum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 126:241–248
   [Google Scholar]
6. George C. G., Kloos W. E. 1994; Comparison of the Smal-digested chromosomes of Staphylococcus epidermidis and the loosely related species Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus caprae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 44:404–409
   [Google Scholar]
7. Grothues D., Tümmler B. 1991; New approaches in genome analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: application to the analysis of Pseudomonas strains. Mol. Microbiol 5:2763–2776
   [Google Scholar]
8. Khattak N. M., Matthews R. C. 1993; Genetic relatedness of Bordetella species as determined by macrorestriction digests resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 43:659–664
   [Google Scholar]
9. Madigan M. T. 1986; Chromatium tepidum sp. nov., a thermophilic photosynthetic bacterium of the family Chromatiaceae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 36:222–227
   [Google Scholar]
10. McClelland M., Jones R., Patel Y., Nelson M. 1987; Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 15:5985–6005
    [Google Scholar]
11. Méndez-Alvarez S., Pavón V., Esteve I., Guerrero R., Gaju N. 1995; Genomic heterogeneity in Chlorobium limicola: chromosomic and plasmidic differences among strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 134:279–285
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pfennig N., Trüper H. G. 1971; Type and neotype strains of the species of phototrophic bacteria maintained in pure culture. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 21:19–24
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pfennig N., Trüper H. G. 1989 Anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. 1635–1653 Murray R. G. E., Brenner D. J., Bryant M. P., Hol J. G., Krieg N. R., Moulder J. W., Pfennig N., Sneath P. H. A., Staley J. T., Williams S. T.ed Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology 3 Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore, Md:
    [Google Scholar]
14. Römling U., Grothues D., Bautsch W., Tümmler B. 1989; A physical genome map of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO. EMBO J 8:4081–4089
    [Google Scholar]
15. Schwartz D. C., Cantor C. R. 1984; Separation of yeast chromosome sized DNAs by pulsed field gel gradient electrophoresis. Cell 37:67–75
    [Google Scholar]
16. Smith C. L., Klco S. R., Cantor C. R. 1988 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and the technology of large DNA molecules. 41–72 Davies K.ed Genome analysis: a practical approach IRL Press; Oxford, United Kingdom:
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sneath P. H. A., Sokal R. R. 1973 Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco, Calif:
    [Google Scholar]
18. Van Gemerden H., Beeftink H. H. 1983 Ecology of phototrophic bacteria. 146–185 Ormerod J. G.ed The phototrophic bacteria Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford, United Kingdom:
    [Google Scholar]