1887

Abstract

The current type strain of , NCTC 4175 (= ATCC 13315), differs substantially from typical strains of this species both biochemically and chemotaxonomically. DNA relatedness studies revealed that strains previously classified as . belong to six genomospecies. One of these genomospecies contains strains that are negative in indole, salicin, and esculin reactions (biogroup 1) and has been named . A second genomospecies, which is most frequently isolated from human urine, contains typical . strains that are positive in indole, salicin, and esculin reactions (biogroup 2). The members of the remaining four genomospecies are indole positive and negative in salicin and esculin reactions (biogroup 3). Of 36 biogroup 3 strains studied, only strain NCTC 4175 (T = type strain) and one other strain, CDC 1732-80, belong to genomospecies 3. To retain NCTC 4175 as the type strain of . would restrict this species to these two strains, whose origins are unknown. This would mean that hundreds of strains for which the description of . was written and which have been representatives of this species for the past 50 years would have to be renamed as members of a new species. To prevent this confusion, we request that biogroup 2 reference strain ATCC 29905 (= CDC PR1) replace NCTC 4175 as the type strain of . .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-45-4-870
1995-10-01
2022-11-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/45/4/ijs-45-4-870.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-45-4-870&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anonymous 1994; Catalogue of the National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC). , 7th.79 Public Health Laboratory Service; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner D. J., Farmer J. J. III, Fanning G. R., Steigerwalt A. G., Klykken P., Wathen H. G., Hickman F. W., Ewing W. H. 1978; Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness of Proteus and Providencia species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 28:269–282
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchanan R. E., Cowan S. T., Clark W. A. 1959; Designation of neotype cultures of the type species of certain genera of the family Enter-obacteriaceae: Salmonella, Shigella, Arizona, Escherichia, Citrobacter, and Proteus. Preliminary statement. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon 9:105–107
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchanan R. E., Cowan S. T., Wiken T., Clark W. A. 1958; International code of nomenclature of bacteria and viruses. Iowa State College Press, Ames;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchanan R. E., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. 1963; Opinion 26. Designation of neotype strains (cultures) of type species of the bacterial genera Salmonella, Shigella, Arizona, Escherichia, Citrobacter, and Proteus of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon 13:35–36
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Costas M., Holmes B., Frith K. A., Riddle C., Hawkey P. M. 1993; Identification and typing of Proteus penneri and Proteus vulgaris biogroups 2 and 3, from clinical sources, by computerized analysis of electrophoretic protein patterns. J. Appl. Bacteriol 75:489–498
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ewing W. H. 1958; Minutes of the International Enterobacteriaceae Subcommittee meetings, VII International Congress of Microbiology, Stockholm, August 1958. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon 8:173–179
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hauser G. 1885; Uber Faulnissbacterien und deren Beziehungen zur Sep-ticamie. Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Spaltpilze12 Vogel, Leipzig; Germany:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hickman F. W., Steigerwalt A. G., Farmer J. J. III, Brenner D. J. 1982; Identification of Proteus penneri sp. nov., formerly known as Proteus vulgaris indole negative or as Proteus vulgaris biogroup 1. J. Clin. Microbiol 15:1097–1102
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lautrop H. 1974; Genus X. Proteus. 327–330 Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  11. McKell J., Jones D. 1976; A numerical taxonomic study of the Proteus-Providence bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol 41:143–161
    [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Hara C, Hickman-Brenner F. W., Steigerwalt A. G., Hill B. C., Tenover F. C., Costas M., Holmes B., Grimont P. A. D., Hawkey P. M., Penner J. L., Miller J. M., Brenner D. J. Unpublished data
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rustigian R., Stuart C. A. 1943; Taxonomic relationships in the genus Proteus . Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med 53:241–243
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sneath P. H. A. 1992; International code of nomenclature of bacteria. 1990 revision. American Society for Microbiology Washington: D.C;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-45-4-870
Loading

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error