1887

Abstract

16S rRNA (genes coding for rRNA) sequence comparisons were conducted with the following three psychrophilic strains: W25 (T = type strain) and W16A, and W5. These strains exhibited more than 99.5% sequence identity and within experimental uncertainty could be regarded as identical. Their close taxonomic relationship was further documented by phenotypic similarities. In contrast, previously published DNA-DNA hybridization results have convincingly established that these strains do not belong to the same species if current standards are used. These results emphasize the important point that effective identity of 16S rRNA sequences is not necessarily a sufficient criterion to guarantee species identity. Thus, although 16S rRNA sequences can be used routinely to distinguish and establish relationships between genera and well-resolved species, very recently diverged species may not be recognizable.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-42-1-166
1992-01-01
2022-08-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/42/1/ijs-42-1-166.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-42-1-166&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ash C., Farrow J. A. E., Dorsch M., Stackebrandt E., Collins M. D. 1991; Comparative analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and related species on the basis of reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:343–346
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ausubel F. M., Brent R., Kingston R. E., Moore D. D., Smith J. A., Siedman J. G., Struhl K. 1987 Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baess I. 1983; Deoxyribonucleic acid relationships between different serovars of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. B 91:201–203
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boddinghaus B., Wolters J., Heikens W., Bottger E. C. 1990; Phylogenetic analysis and identification of different serovars of Mycobacterium intracellulare at the molecular level. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 70:197–204
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Claus D., Fritz D. 1989 Taxonomy of Bacillus. 5–26 Harwood C. R.ed Bacillus Plenum Press; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins M. D., Ash C., Farrow J. A. E., Wallblanks S., Williams A. M. 1989; 16S rRNA sequence analysis of lactococci and related taxa. Description of Vagococcus fluvialis gen. nov., sp. nov. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 67:453–460
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fox G. E., Jurtshuk P. Jr. et al. Unpublished data
  8. Gordon R. E. 1981 One hundred and seven years of the genus Bacillus. 1–15 Berkeley R. C. W., Goodfellow M.ed The aerobic endospore-forming bacteria: classification and identification Academic Press; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gordon R. E., Haynes W. C., Pang C. H.-N. 1973 The genus Bacillus. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Handbook no. 427. U.S. Department of Agriculture; Washington, D.C:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gottlieb P., Rudner R. 1985; Restriction site polymorphism of ribonucleic acid gene sets in members of the genus Bacillus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 35:244–252
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Green C. J., Stewart G. C., Hollis M. A., Void B. S., Bott K. F. 1985; Nucleotide sequence of the Bacillus subtilis RNA operon rrnB. Gene. 37:261–266
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Herbert R. A. 1986 The ecology and physiology of psychrophilic microorganisms. 1–23 Herbert R. A., Codd G. A.ed Microbes in extreme environments Academic Press; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lane D. J., Pace B., Olsen G. J., Stahl D. A., Sogin M. L., Pace N. R. 1985; Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:6955–6959
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Larkin J. M., Stokes J. L. 1966; Isolation of psychrophilic species of Bacillus. J. Bacteriol. 91:1667–1671
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Larkin J. M., Stokes J. L. 1967; Taxonomy of psychrophilic strains of Bacillus. J. Bacteriol. 94:889–895
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Messing J., Vieira J. 1982; A new pair of M13 vectors for selecting either strand of double-digest restriction fragments. Gene 19:269–276
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Murray R. G. E., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., DeVos P., Goodfellow M., Grimont P. A. D., Pfennig N., Stacklebrandt E., Zavarzin G. A. 1990; Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Approaches to Taxonomy Within the Proteobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40:213–215
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Nakamura L. K. 1984; Bacillus psychrophilus sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 34:121–123
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Priest F. G., Goodfellow M., Todd C. 1981 The genus Bacillus: a numerical analysis. 91–103 Berkeley R. C. W., Goodfellow M.ed The aerobic endospore-forming bacteria: classification and identification Academic Press; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Priest F. G., Goodfellow M., Todd C. 1988; A numerical classification of the genus Bacillus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 143:1847–1882
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rössler D., Ludwig W., Schleifer K. H., Lin C., McGill T. J., Wisotzkey J. D., Jurtshuk P. Jr., Fox G. E. 1991; Phylogenetic diversity in the genus Bacillus as seen by 16S rRNA sequencing studies. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 14:266–291
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ruger H. J. 1983; Differentiation of Bacillus globisporus, Bacillus marinus comb, nov., Bacillus aminovorans, and Bacillus insolitus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:157–161
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruger H. J., Richter G. 1979; Bacillus psychrophilus Larkin and Stokes 1967, a later subjective synonym of Bacillus globisporus Larkin and Stokes 1967. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 29:194–195
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sneath P. H. A. 1984 Endospore-forming gram-positive rods and cocci. 1104–1207 Kreig N. R., Holt J. G.ed Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology 2 The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sogin M. L. 1990 Amplification of ribosomal RNA genes for molecular evolution studies. 307–314 Innis M. A., Gelfand D. H., Sninsky J. J., White T. J.ed PCR protocols, a guide to methods and applications Academic Press; San Diego:
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stanton T. B., Jensen N. S., Casey T. A., Tordoff L. A., Dewhirst R. E., Paster B. J. 1991; Reclassification of Treponema hyodysenteriae and Treponema innocens in a new genus, Serpula, as Serpula hyodysenteriae comb. nov. and Serpula innocens comb, nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:50–58
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., Grimont P. A. D., Kandler O., Krichevsky M. I., Moore L. H., Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E., Stacklebrandt E., Starr M. R., Triiper H. G. 1987; Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Whiley R. A., Fraser H. Y., Douglas C. W. I., Hardie J. M., Williams A. M., Collins M. D. 1990; Streptococcus parasanguis sp. nov., an atypical viridans Streptococcus from human clinical specimens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 68:115–122
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wisotzkey J. D. Unpublished data
  30. Wistozkey J. D., Jurtshuk P. Jr., Fox G. E. 1990; PCR amplification of 16S rDNA from lyophilized cell culture facilitates studies in microbial systematics. Curr. Microbiol. 21:325–327
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-42-1-166
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-42-1-166
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error