Agrobacterium isolates from grapevines that were previously characterized as biovar 3 strains were compared with the type strains of the four previously described species of the genus Agrobacterium, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Agrobacterium radiobacter, Agrobacterium rhizogenes, and Agrobacterium rubi. Ten grapevine isolates were distinguished from other Agrobacterium species phenotypically by a number of biochemical tests and by their reaction with a monoclonal antibody raised to biovar 3. Levels of DNA binding between the type strains of previously described species and three grapevine isolates were estimated by optical measurement of initial DNA renaturation rates. The levels of DNA binding between grapevine isolates were 78 to 92%, and the levels of DNA binding with other type strains ranged from 7 to 47%. Our results indicate that the grapevine isolates are distinct from the type strains of the four previously described Agrobacterium species. A new species, Agrobacterium vitis, is proposed; the type strain is strain NCPPB 3554.
AlarconB., LopezM. M., CambraM., OrtizJ.1987; Comparative study of Agrobacterium biotypes 1, 2 and 3 by electrophoresis and serological methods. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 62:295–308
BishopA. L., BurrT. J., MittakV. L., KatzB. H.1989; A monoclonal antibody specific to Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 and its utilization for indexing grapevine propagation material. Phytopathology 79:995–998
BurrT. J., BishopA. L., KatzB. H., BlanchardL. M., BazziC.1987; A root decay specific to grapevine caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and A. radiobacter biovar 3. Phytopathology 77:1424–1427
BurrT. J., KatzB. H.1983; Isolation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 from grapevine galls and sap and from vineyard soil. Phytopathology 71:163–165
EUisJ. G., KerrA., Van MontaguM., SchellJ.1979; Agrobacterium: genetic studies on agrocin production and the biological control of crown gall. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 15:311–319
HeberleinG. T., De LeyJ., TijtgatR.1967; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology and taxonomy of Agrobacterium, Rhizobium, and Chromobacterium. J. Bacteriol. 94:116–124
KerstersK., De LeyJ.1984 Genus III. Agrobacterium. 244–254KriegN. R., HoltJ. G.edBergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology1 The Williams & Wilkins Co.; Baltimore:
MandelM., MarmurJ.1968; Use of ultraviolet absorbance-temperature profiles for determining the guanine plus cytosine content of DNA. Methods Enzymol 12B:195–206
OphelK., BurrT. J., MagareyP. A., KerrA.1988; Detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biovar 3 in South Australian grapevine propagation material. Australas. Plant Pathol. 17:61–66
PanagopoulosC. G., PsallidasP. G., AlivizatosA. S.1978; Studies on biotype 3 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens var. tumefaciens. 221–228Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Angers. Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueAngers, France
PetitA., TempeJ., KerrA., HolstersM., Van MontaguM., SchellJ.1978; Substrate induction of conjugative activity of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmids. Nature (London) 271:570–571
RyderM. H., TateM. E., KerrA.1985; Virulence properties of strains of Agrobacterium on the apical and basal surfaces of carrot root discs. Plant Physiol. 77:215–221
Van LarebekeN., GenetelloC., SchellJ., SchilperoortR. A., HermansA. K., HernalsteensJ. P., Van MontaguM.1975; Acquisition of tumour-inducing ability by non-oncogenic agrobacteria as a result of plasmid transfer. Nature (London) 255:742–743
WayneL. G., BrennerD. J., ColwellR. R., GrimontP. A. D., KandlerO., KrichevskyM. I., MooreL. H., MooreW. E. C., MurrayR. G. E., StackebrandtE., StarrM. P., TruperH. G.1987; Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463–464
WhiteL. O.1972; The taxonomy of the crown gall organism Agrobacterium tumefaciens and its relationship to rhizobia and other agrobacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 72:565–574