Status of Nomenclatural Types in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names Request for an Opinion

References

1. Ad Hoc Committee of the Judicial Commission of the ICSB 1976; First draft, approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 26:563–599
   [Google Scholar]
2. Buchanan R. E., Holt J. G., Lessel E. F. Jr. 1966 Index Bergeyana The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
   [Google Scholar]
3. Canale-Parola E. 1981; Proposal that Spirochaeta stenostrepta Zuelzer replace Spirochaeta plicatalis Ehrenberg as the type species of the genus Spirochaeta Ehrenberg. Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 31:105–106
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cato E. P., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. C. 1981; Designation of Eubacterium limosum (Eggerth) Prévot as the type species of Eubacterium. Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 31:209–210
   [Google Scholar]
5. Editorial Board 1953; Status of generic names of bacteria proposed by Trevisan. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon 3:87–108
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ewing W. H., Farmer J. J. III, Brenner D. J. 1980; Proposal of Enterobacteriaceae fam. nov., nom. rev. to replace Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937, nom. fam. cons. (Opin. 15, Jud. Comm. 1958), which lost standing in nomenclature on 1 January 1980. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:674–675
   [Google Scholar]
7. Farmer J. J. III, Brenner D. J., Ewing W. H. 1980; Opposition to recent proposals which would reject the family name Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia as its type genus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:660–673
   [Google Scholar]
8. Holmes B., Owen R. J. 1979; Proposal that Flavobacterium breve be substituted as the type species of the genus in place of Flavobacterium aquatile and emended description of the genus Flavobacterium: status of the named species of Flavobacterium . Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:416–426
   [Google Scholar]
9. Holt J. G. 1979; International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology Judicial Commission. Minutes of the Meeting, 3 September 1978, Munich, West Germany. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:267–269
   [Google Scholar]
10. Judicial Commission 1953; Minutes of the Judicial Commission meetings held at Rome in connection with the VI International Congress for Microbiology, September, 1953. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. Taxon 3:141–154
    [Google Scholar]
11. Judicial Commission 1954; Opinion 13. Conservation and rejection of names of genera of bacteria proposed by Trevisan 1842-1890. Int. Bull. Bacteriol. Nomencl. and Taxon 4:151–156
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lapage S. P. 1979; Proposal of Enterobacteraceae nom. nov. as a substitute for the illegitimate but conserved name Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937. Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:265–266
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. 1975 International code of nomenclature of bacteria. 1975 Revision American Society for Microbiology; Washington, D.C:
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lessel E. F. 1974; Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Minutes of Meeting, 29 August 1973, Jerusalem, Israel. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 24:379–380
    [Google Scholar]
15. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:225–420
    [Google Scholar]