Two New and Closely Related Heterothallic Species, Pichia amylophila and Pichia mississippiensis

References

1. Bak A. L., Stenderup A. 1969; Deoxyribonucleic acid homology in yeasts. Genetic relatedness within the genus Candida.. J. Gen. Microbiol 59:21–30
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bernardi G., Foures M., Piperno G., Slonimski P. P. 1970; Mitochondrial DNAs from respiratory-suf-ficient and cytoplasmic respiratory-deficient mutants of yeast. J. Mol. Biol 48:23–43
   [Google Scholar]
3. Britten R. J., Kohne D. E. 1968; Repeated se quences in DNA. Science 161:529–540
   [Google Scholar]
4. De Ley J., Cattoir H., Reynaerts A. 1970; The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur. J. Biochem 12:133–142
   [Google Scholar]
5. Denhardt D. T. 1966; A membrane filter technique for the detection of complementary DNA. Biochem. Bio-phys. Res. Commun 23:641–646
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gillespie D., Spiegelman S. 1965; A quantitative assay for DNA-RNA hybrids with DNA immobilized on a membrane. J. Mol. Biol 12:829–842
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kreger-van Rij N. J. W. 1970; Pichia Hansen. p 455–554 In Lodder J. ed The yeasts—a taxonomic study. North-Holland Publishing Co; Amsterdam:
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kurtzman C. P., Smiley M. J. 1976; Heterothallism in Pichia kudriavzeviiPichia terricola.. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol 42:355–363
   [Google Scholar]
9. Marmur J. 1961; A procedure for the isolation of DNA from microorganisms. J. Mol. Biol 3:208–218
   [Google Scholar]
10. Martini A., Phaff H. J. 1973; The optical deter mination of DNA-DNA homologies in yeasts. Ann. Microbiol 23:59–68
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mendonca-Hagler L. C., Phaff H. J. 1975; Deoxy ribonucleic acid base composition and deoxyribonucleic aeid/deoxyribonucleic acid hybrid formation in psy-chrophobic and related yeasts. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 25:222–229
    [Google Scholar]
12. Meyer S. A., Anderson K., Brown R. E., Smith M. T., Yarrow D., Mitchell G., Ahearn D. G. 1975; Physiological and DNA characterization of Candida maltosa, a hydrocarbon utilizing yeast. Arch. Microbiol 104:225–231
    [Google Scholar]
13. Meyer S. A., Brown R. E., Smith M. T. 1977; Species status of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii Pijper. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 27:162–164
    [Google Scholar]
14. Montrocher R. 1967; Quelques nouvelles especes et var-ietes du genre Candida (levures asporogenes). Rev. Mycol 32:689–92
    [Google Scholar]
15. Price C. W., Fuson G. B., Phaff H. J. 1978; Genome comparison in yeast systematics: delimitation of species within the genera Schwanniomyces, Saccha-romyces, Debaryomyces. Pichia. Microbiol. Rev 42:161–193
    [Google Scholar]
16. Schildkraut C. L., Marmur J., Doty P. 1962; Determination of the base composition of deoxyribo-nucleic acid from its buoyant density in CsCl. J. Mol. Biol 4:430–433
    [Google Scholar]
17. Seidler R. J., Knittel M. D., Brown C. 1975; Potential pathogens in the environment: cultural reac-tions and nucleic acid studies on Klebsiella pneumoniae from chemical and environmental sources. Appl. Microbiol 29:819–825
    [Google Scholar]
18. Seidler R. J., Mandel M. 1971; Quantitative as pects of deoxyribonucleic acid renaturation: base com-position, state of chromosome replication, and polynu-cleotide homologies. J. Bacteriol 106:608–614
    [Google Scholar]
19. Szybalski W. 1968; Use of cesium sulfate for equilibrium density gradient centrifugation. Methods Enzymol 12B:330–360
    [Google Scholar]
20. Wetmur J. G., Davidson N. 1968; Kinetics of renaturation of DNA. J. Mol. Biol 31:349–370
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wickerham L. J. 1951; Taxonomy of yeasts. p 1–56 Technical bulletin 1029 U. S. Department of Agriculture; Washington, D.C:
    [Google Scholar]
22. Wickerham L. J., Burton K. A. 1956; Hybridiza tion studies involving Saccharomyces lactisZygo-saccharomyces ashbyi.. J. Bacteriol 71:290–295
    [Google Scholar]
23. Winge O., Laustsen O. 1939; On 14 new veast types produced by hybridization. C. R. Trav. Lab. Carls-berg, Ser. Physiol 22:337–352
    [Google Scholar]