1887

Abstract

On the basis of long-term experience with the preservation of the pathogenic bacteria of the Czechoslovak National Collection of Type Cultures, it is concluded that the suspending medium is a factor of primary importance in the preservation of these organisms in the freeze-dried state. The primary index of suspending medium effectiveness is the level of protection it affords against the adverse effects of low (subzero) temperatures, dehydration, long-term storage, and rehydration. A number of simple and compound suspending media were studied for their protective effects on cultures from over 50 genera of predominantly pathogenic bacteria. The results indicate that not only each bacterial genus and species but also frequently every strain of a given serological type must be looked upon as a distinct biological entity, the preservation of the viability, activity, and desirable characters of which must be tested in different protective media in preliminary experiments. Heat testing (at 75 to 100 C) of freeze-dried cultures kept under high vacuum is recommended as a good indicator of adequate protection provided by a suspending medium. With the freeze-drying technique used, the best results for the largest number of species were obtained with a mixture of calf serum or defibrinated sheep blood and lactose solution (to a final concentration of 5 to 10%) and Annear’s peptone-containing medium. Individual suspending media were evaluated in relation to individual strains, and recommendations are made as to the preferred medium on the basis of control tests performed at 5-, 10-, and 15-year intervals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-24-3-358
1974-07-01
2022-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/24/3/ijs-24-3-358.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-24-3-358&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Annear D.I. 1956; The preservation of bacteria by drying in peptone plugs. J. Hyg 54:487–508
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berge T.O., Jewett R. L., Blair W.O. 1971; Preservation of enteroviruses by freeze-drying. Appl. Microbiol 22:850–853
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berman S., Altieri P.L., offinger A.G., Lowenthal J.P. 1966; Freeze-drying various strains of Shigella.. Appl. Microbiol 16: 1779 1781
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Garvie E.I. 1967; Preservation of Vibrio fetus by freeze drying. J. Appl. Bacteriol 30:255–260
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gore L.F. 1970; Storage of freeze-dried cultures. Lab. Pract 19:923
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hopwood D.A., Ferguson H.M. 1969; A rapid method for lyophilizing Streptomyces cultures. J. Appl. Bacteriol 32:434–436
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hostálek Z. 1957; The Maintenance of Eremothe- ciumashbyi. J. Gen. Microbiol 17:267–273
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jung M., Krech U. 1971; Lyophilization of human cytomegalovirus. Pathol. Microbiol 37:47–56
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lapage S.P., Shelton J.E., Mitchell T.G. 1970; Media for the maintenance and preservationof bacteria. p. 1–134 In Norris J.R., Ribbons D.W. , (ed.). Methods in microbiology, vol. 3A. Academic Press Inc.; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lapage S.P., Shelton J.E., Mitchell T.G., Mackenzie A.R. 1970; Culture collections and the preservation of bacteria. p. 135–288 In Norris J.R., Ribbons D.W. , (ed.). Methods in Microbiology, vol. 3A. Academic Press Inc; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Leach R.H., Scott W.J. 1959; The influence of rehydration on the viability of dried micro-organisms. J. Gen. Microbiol 21:295–307
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Naylor H.B., Smith P.A. 1946; Factors affecting the viability of Serratia marcescens during dehydration and storage. J. Bacteriol 52:565–573
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Norman M.C., Franck E.B., Choate R.V. 1970; Preservation of Mycoplasma strains by freezing in liquid nitrogen and by lyophilization with sucrose. Appl. Microbiol 20:69–77
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Protocala R., Samuel I., Popescu M. 1969; Effect of lyophilization on Picornaviruses. Arch. Gesamte Virsuforsch 28:97–99
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Record B.R., Popescu R. 1953; Some factors influencing the survival of Bacterium coli on freeze-drying. J. Gen. Microbiol 9:475–484
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rey L. 1964; Aspects théoretiques et industriels de la lyophilisation. Hermann-Paris
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rhoades H.E. 1970; Effects of 20 years storage on lyophilizedcultures of bacteria, molds, viruses and yeasts. Amer. J. Vet. Res 31: 1867 1871
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Richards M., Elliott F.R. 1968; Freezedrying characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. carlsbergensis. Antonie von Leewenhoek. J. Microbiol. Serol 34:227–233
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rowe T.W.G. 1960; The theory and practice of freeze-drying. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 85:641–679
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Seastone C.V. 1971; Viability of lyophilized streptococci. J. Infect. Dis 124:619
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Servin-Massieu K., Cruz-Camarillo R. 1969; Variants of Serratia marcescens induced by freeze-drying. Appl. Microbiol 18:689–691
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sourek J. 1969; Catalogue of pathogenic microorganisms. Prague
    [Google Scholar]
  23. van Drimmelen G.C., Steyn H.S. 1958; The keeping quality of freeze-dried Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccine. J. Gen. Microbiol 19:324–329
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-24-3-358
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-24-3-358
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error