1887

Abstract

(Hamm) Douglas was first described under the name by A. Hamm in 1912. A study of Hamm’s publication indicates that the original characterization of this organism was based primarily on published reports of anaerobic staphylococci isolated by other authors, even though Hamm did mention the isolation of an anaerobic coccus. The currently accepted descriptions of this organism were not taken from the original publication by Hamm but from the description of by A. R. Prévot in 1933. Modern data and insight strongly suggest that the original description of Hamm was based on a very small number of generally variable and nondifferentiating characteristics of strains which very probably represented several species of anaerobic cocci. Provision 3 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria states that “…names applied to a group made up of two or more discordant elements, especially if these elements were erroneously supposed to form part of the same individual () …” are to be placed on the list of nomina rejicienda. Therefore, it is requested that the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology issue an Opinion establishing the name (Hamm) Douglas as a nomen confusum according to Provision 3 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and placing it on the list of rejected names.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-3-283
1973-07-01
2022-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/23/3/ijs-23-3-283.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-3-283&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bondy O. 1912; Klinische und bakteriologische Beiträge sur Lehre vom Abortus. Z. Geburtsh. Gynaekol 70:417–485
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Distaso A. 1912; Contribution à l’étude sur l’intoxication intestinale. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. Infektionskr. Hyg Abt. 1 62:433–468
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Douglas H. C. 1957; Genus VI. Peptococcus Kluyver and van Niel; 1936474–480 Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. T. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology 1957, 7. Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Foubert E. L. Jr., Douglas H. C. 1948; Studies on the anaerobic micrococci. J. Bacteriol 56:25–34
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamm A. 1912; Die Puerperal Wundinfektion. Julius Springer; Berlin:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heurlin M. 1910; Bakteriologische Untersu-chungen des Keimgehaltes im Genitalkanale der fiebern den Wöchnerinnen mit Bericksichtung der Gesamtmorbiditat im Lauf eines Jahres. Akad. Abh. Helsigfors1–618
    [Google Scholar]
  7. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria 1966 Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 16:459–490
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jungano M. 1907; Sur un staphylocoque anaérobie. C.R. Soc. Biol 62:707–708
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jungano M., Distaso A. 1910; Les anaérobies. Masson et Cie, Paris
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Prévot A. R. 1933; Études de systématique bactérienne. I. Lois générates. II. Cocci anaérobies. Ann. Sci. Nat. Botan Ser. 10 15:1–260
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Prévot A. R., Turpin A., Kaiser P. 1967; Les bactéries anaérobies. Dunod, Paris
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schottmüller H. 1911; Ueber bakteriologische Untersuchungen und ihre Methoden bei Febris puerperalis. München Med. Wochenschr 58:787–789
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Schottmüller H. 1912; Ein anaerober Staphylo-coccus (Staphylococcus aerogenes) als Erreger von Puerperalfieber. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. Infektionskr. Hyg Abt. 1 64:270–284
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Staff of the Anaerobe Laboratory 1969; Outline of clinical methods in anaerobic bacteriology; 21 V.P.I. Anaerobe Laboratory; Blacksburg, Va:
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tissier H., Martelly  . 1902; Recherches sur la putréfaction de la viande de boucherie. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 16:865–903
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wegelius W. 1909; Bakteriologische Untersuchungen der weiblichen Genital-secrete wahrend der Entbindung und des Wochenbetts, mitt besonderer Berüksichtung der Frage von der puerperalen Selbstinfektion. Arch. Gynaekol 88:249–390
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-3-283
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-23-3-283
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error