1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Fifty-seven characteristics of the proposed neotype strains of Vibrio cholerae Pacini 1854 and Vibrio eltor Pribram 1933 are compared. These organisms are so similar that they should be included in the same species under the name which has priority, Vibrio cholerae. Pribram (1933) appears to have been the first to publish validly the name V. eltor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-61
1965-01-01
2024-05-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/15/1/ijs-15-1-61.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-61&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Doorenbos W., Kop J. 1951; El Tor vibrios in chloramphenicol estimation. The Lancet 1:691 24 March.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisler M. 1909; Ueber Wirkungen von Salzen auf Bakterien. Centralbl. f. Bakter. I Abt. Orig. 51:546–564
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Feeley J. C., Pittman M. 1963; Studies on the haemolytic activity of El Tor vibrios. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 28:347–356
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Felsenfeld O. 1963; Some observations on the cholera (El Tor) epidemic in 1961-62. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 28:289–296
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Felsenfeld O. 1964; Present status of the El Tor vibrio problem. Bacteriol. Reviews 28:72–86
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Felsenfeld O., Soman D. W., Water T., Ishihara S. J. 1951; Studies on recently isolated cholera vibrios. Re-evaluation of culture methods. Jour. Bacteriol. 62:175–180
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Finkelstein R. A., Mukerjee S. 1963; Haemagglutination: A rapid method for differentiating Vibrio cholerae and El Tor vibrios. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 112:355–359
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gallut J. 1962; Le cholera à vibrion d’El Tor. Rev. Med. Hyg. d’Outre-Mer 34:82–84
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gan K. H., Tjia S. K. 1963; A new method for the differentiation of V. comma and V. El Tor. Amer. Jour. Hyg. 77:184–186
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gotschlich F. 1906; Über Cholera and choleraähnliche Vibrionen unter den aus Mekka zurückkehrenden Pilgern. . Zeitsch. f. Hyg. 53:281–304
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hugh R. 1962; The taxonomy of El Tor vibrios. Amer. Soc. Microbiol. Abstr. 62nd Annual Meet., Kansas City, Missouri, Bacteriol. Proc.:52
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hugh R. 1964; The proposed conservation of the generic name Vibrio Pacini 1954 and designation of the neotype strain of Vibrio cholerae Pacini 1854. Intl. Bull. Bact. Nomencl. and Tax. 14:87–101
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hugh R. 1965; A comparison of the proposed neotype strain and 258 isolates of Vibrio cholerae Pacini. Intl. Bull. Bact. Nomencl. and Tax. 15:13–24
    [Google Scholar]
  14. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Viruses 1958 Iowa State University Press, Ames.:186
  15. Kauffmann F. 1950; On the serology of the Vibrio cholerae. Acta Path. et Microbiol. Scandinav. 27:283–299
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kraus R. 1903; Zur Differenzierung des Choleravibrio von artverwandten Vibrionen. Wien. klin. Wschr. 16:1382–85
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kraus R., Pribram E. 1905; Zur Frage der Taxonbildung des Choleravibrio. Wiener Klinische Wschr. 18:999–1001
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kraus R., Pribram E. 1906; Ueber Choleravibrionen und andere pathogene Vibrionen. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. I Abt. Orig. 41:15–21
    [Google Scholar]
  19. de Moor C. E. 1938; Un vibrion du type “el Tor” responsible, dans la partie sud de Pile de Celebes (Indes Néerlandaises), D’une épidémie preséntant les apparences completes du cholera. Bull. de l’Office Intl. d’Hyg. Publique 30:1510–1519
    [Google Scholar]
  20. de Moor C. E. 1949; Enteritis choleriformis El Tor van Loghem. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 2:5–17
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mukerjee S. 1963; The bacteriophage susceptibility test in differentiating Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio el tor. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 28:333–336
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mukerjee S., Guha Roy U. K. . 1962; The vibrios of the recent cholera-like outbreak in Hong Kong. Brit. Med. Jour. 5279:685–687
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Newman F. S. 1960; Differentiation of the El Tor vibrio from other strains of Vibrio cholerae on the basis of phage typing. Bacteriol. Proc. (Soc. Amer. Bacteriol.)77
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pacini F. 1954; Osservazione microscopiche e Deduzioni patologiche sul Cholera Asiatico. Gazzetta Medica Italiana Toscana, Firenze, Serie 2, Tome 4 6:405–412
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pribram E. 1933; Klassifikation der Schizomyceten (Bakterien). F. Deuticke Leipzig:143
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tanamal S. T. W. 1948; Een serologische en cooloidchemischen reactie ter onderscheiding van cholera en El Tor vibrionen. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneesk. 92:1370–1375
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Unger L., Rahman A. K. M. M., DeMoss R. D. 1961; Anaerobic dissimilation of glucose by Vibrio comma. Canadian Jour. Microbiol. 7:844–847
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-61
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-61
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error