Culture-independent Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) screening for Haemophilus influenzae cross-infection in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) Open Access

Abstract

Background

There is some evidence of across-infection between patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB), and clear evidence in Cystic Fibrosis. () is the more common pathogen in NFCB patients, yet cross-infectionremains unexplored. We present the novel application of culture-independent Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) to screen for cross-infection of in NCFB in both culture-positive and -negative samples.

Methods

We interrogated DNA from 32 sputum samples (26 patients) in our NCFB biorepository, who were known to have H.influenzae in their sputum by preceding 16S rRNA sequencing. Fragments of 7 housekeeping genes were amplified and sequenced. Sequence types were allocated via the MLST scheme. For 5 patients, multiple sputum samples taken at least 4 months apart were assessed longitudinally.

Results

Culture-independent MLST identified 31 of 32 sputum samples as harboring . Of these, 26 were positive for using culture methods. 25 of the 26 culture-positive samples were MLST positive. All 6 culture-negative samples were MLST positive. A MLST sequence type (ST) was allocated to 27 of 32 sputum samples. Five patients had multiple sputum samples with matching STs, indicating strain stability and the consistency of MLST. Two patients who were known household contacts had matching STs and possibly transmitted H.influenzae in their household. The remaining 15 STs were unique, suggesting no evidence of cross-infection.

Conclusion

Culture-independent MLST identifies in culture-negative patients with NCFB and is a potential screening tool for cross-infection. This study did not reveal potential cross-infection events in this cohort.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.fis2019.po0173
2020-02-28
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.fis2019.po0173
Loading

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed