1887

Abstract

Background

Accurate and routine-friendly methods for MIC determination of anaerobes are demanded. Here, we evaluate the performance of a commercially available microdilution panel in comparison to a gradient MIC Strip test.

Methods

N=163 anaerobes clinical isolates (60 species, 23 genera) were tested with the MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes MIC panel (MERLIN Diagnostika, Germany). The same bacterial suspension was used for the panel inoculum, and for testing by MIC Strips (Liofilchem, Italy). The panels were incubated at 37 °C in anaerobic conditions for ≥24 h, and read visually. In case of no bacterial growth for the growth control, incubation was prolonged to 48-72 h. Results were interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines. Comparison was performed in terms of essential agreement, category agreement and error rates.

Results

Category agreement with MIC strips resulted overall 95% (from 95.6% to 100%). Essential agreement resulted 91.1% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 95% for all the otherantibiotics. Overall, n=15 minor errors, n=2 major errors and n=5 very major errors were observed. For doxycycline, tigecycline and moxifloxacin (for which no breakpoints are available), MICRONAUT results diverged for ≤1 dilution fold from MIC Strips results. For most isolates (117/163) the panels were readable after overnight incubation, in 42 cases after 48 h, in 4 cases after 72 h.

Conclusions

The MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes MIC panels proved to be a reliable microdilution method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes, providing results consistent with gradient methodology, with both fast and slow growing species. The ease-of-handling and -result interpretation makes this method suitable for routine implementation.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.afm2019.po0009
2019-09-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.afm2019.po0009
Loading

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error