Skip to content
1887

Abstract

DSM 120150, DSM 120151, DSM 41987, DSM 41950 and DSM 120149 are five Antarctic strains. Here, we present the high-quality genome sequences of DSM 120150, DSM 120151, DSM 41987, DSM 41950 and DSM 120149 with sizes of 7.51 Mbp, 6.90 Mbp, 8.91 Mbp, 6.01 Mbp and 6.85 Mbp, respectively.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • German Academic Exchange Service (Award 57588370)
    • Principal Award Recipient: UlrikeTarazona Janampa
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (Award K445/2022)
    • Principal Award Recipient: YvonneMast
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001141.v3
2026-02-12
2026-03-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/8/2/acmi001141.v3.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001141.v3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Avila C. Biological and chemical diversity in Antarctica: from new species to new natural products. Biodiversity 2016; 17:5–11 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sivalingam P, Hong K, Pote J, Prabakar K. Extreme environment Streptomyces: potential sources for new antibacterial and anticancer drug leads?. Int J Microbiol 2019; 2019:5283948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Liao L, Su S, Zhao B, Fan C, Zhang J et al. Biosynthetic potential of a novel antarctic actinobacterium Marisediminicola antarctica ZS314T revealed by genomic data mining and pigment characterization. Mar Drugs 2019; 17:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Núñez-Pons L, Avila C, Romano G, Verde C, Giordano D. UV-Protective Compounds in Marine Organisms from the Southern Ocean. Mar Drugs 2018; 16:336 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Li A-Z, Han X-B, Zhang M-X, Zhou Y, Chen M et al. Culture-dependent and -independent analyses reveal the diversity, structure, and assembly mechanism of benthic bacterial community in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2523 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mast Y, Stegmann E. Actinomycetes: the antibiotics producers. Antibiotics 2019; 8:105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Subramani R, Sipkema D. Marine rare actinomycetes: a promising source of structurally diverse and unique novel natural products. Mar Drugs 2019; 17:249 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nouioui I, Boldt J, Zimmermann A, Makitrynskyy R, Pötter G et al. Biotechnological and pharmaceutical potential of twenty-eight novel type strains of Actinomycetes from different environments worldwide. Curr Res Microb Sci 2024; 7:100290 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Quinn GA, Dyson PJ. Going to extremes: progress in exploring new environments for novel antibiotics. NPJ Antimicrob Resist 2024; 2:8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Medeiros W, Kralova S, Oliveira V, Ziemert N, Sehnal L. Antarctic bacterial natural products: from genomic insights to drug discovery. Nat Prod Rep 2025; 42:774–787 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Handayani I, Saad H, Ratnakomala S, Lisdiyanti P, Kusharyoto W et al. Mining Indonesian microbial biodiversity for novel natural compounds by a combined genome mining and molecular networking approach. Mar Drugs 2021; 19:316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA. Practical Streptomyces Genetics UK: The John Innes Foundation Norwich; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mahmoud FM, Pritsch K, Siani R, Benning S, Radl V et al. Comparative genomic analysis of strain Priestia megaterium B1 reveals conserved potential for adaptation to endophytism and plant growth promotion. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0042224 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 2021; 10:1–4 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fukasawa Y, Ermini L, Wang H, Carty K, Cheung MS. LongQC: a quality control tool for third generation sequencing long read data. G3 2020; 10:1193–1196 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Wagenaar JA, Zomer AL. RFPlasmid: predicting plasmid sequences from short-read assembly data using machine learning. Microb Genom 2021; 7:000683 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:1072–1075 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D1020–D1028 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh H-S, Cho JH et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Carro L, Castro JF, Razmilic V, Nouioui I, Pan C et al. Uncovering the potential of novel micromonosporae isolated from an extreme hyper-arid Atacama Desert soil. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4678 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Camacho Pozo MI, Wieme AD, Pérez SR, Llauradó Maury G, Snauwaert C et al. Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. crassaminis subsp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, and reappraisal of Nocardiopsis alborubida Grund and Kroppenstedt 1990 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6172–6179 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li J, Tian XP, Zhu TJ, Yang LL, Li WJ. Streptomyces fildesensis sp. nov., a novel streptomycete isolated from Antarctic soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2011; 100:537–543 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Le Roes-Hill M, Rohland J, Meyers PR, Cowan DA, Burton SG. Streptomyces hypolithicus sp. nov., isolated from an Antarctic hypolith community. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2032–2035 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Somphong A, Polyiam W, Suriyachadkun C, Sripreechasak P, Harunari E et al. Streptomyces pyxinae sp. nov. and Streptomyces pyxinicus sp. nov. isolated from lichen Pyxine cocoes (Sw.) Nyl. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Cortés-Albayay C, Dorador C, Schumann P, Schniete JK, Herron P et al. Streptomyces altiplanensis sp. nov., an alkalitolerant species isolated from Chilean Altiplano soil, and emended description of Streptomyces chryseus (Krasil’nikov et al. 1965) Pridham 1970. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2498–2505 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pridham TG, Hesseltine CW, Benedict RG. A guide for the classification of streptomycetes according to selected groups; Placement of strains in morphological sections. Appl Microbiol 1958; 6:52–79 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pridham GT. New names and new combinations in the order Actinomycetales Buchanan 1917. Technical Bulletins; 1970 https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.171852
  31. Waksman S, Henrici A. Family III. Streptomycetaceae Waksman and Henrici. In Breed R, Murray E, Hitchens A. eds Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 6th ed Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1948 pp 929–980
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lindenbein W. Über einige chemisch interessante Aktinomycetenstämme und ihre Klassifizierung. Archiv Mikrobiol 1952; 17:361–383 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Waksman S, Lechevalier H. Guide to the Classification and Identification of the Actinomycetes and Their Antibiotics Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1953 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Xing J, Jiang X, Kong D, Zhou Y, Li M et al. Streptomyces soli sp. nov., isolated from birch forest soil. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:1687–1692 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Li C, Cao P, Jiang M, Sun T, Shen Y et al. Streptomyces oryziradicis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere soil of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:465–472 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Carro L, Riesco R, Spröer C, Trujillo ME. Micromonospora ureilytica sp. nov., Micromonospora noduli sp. nov. and Micromonospora vinacea sp. nov., isolated from Pisum sativum nodules. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3509–3514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mo P, Zhou J, Zhou F, He J, Zou W et al. Nocardiopsis akebiae sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinomycete isolated from fruits of Akebia trifoliata. Arch Microbiol 2022; 204:643 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz ZL et al. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:W32–W38 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001141.v3
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001141.v3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error