Skip to content
1887

Abstract

is a foodborne pathogen commonly present in seafood. Of the various serotypes reported, O3:K6, O1:K25, O1:KUT and O4:K68 represent the major serotypes among pandemic clones that emerged from 1995 onward. However, new molecular markers of pandemic clones remain unidentified, and limited genomic sequence data are available for non-pandemic strains. Therefore, we aimed to identify novel genetic markers specific to pandemic strains by comparing non-pandemic and pandemic strains using whole-genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis of 163 . strains revealed high genomic diversity within the species. The analysis also revealed a pandemic clade consisting of serotypes O3:K6, O1:K25, O1:KUT and O4:K68 strains isolated after 1995. We identified the genomic island GI-110 (VPaI-5) as a potential marker exclusive to the pandemic clade. Multiplex PCR detection of VPaI-5 demonstrated high specificity for pandemic strains, outperforming the detection of existing markers. The capacity of multiplex PCR for VPaI5 in distinguishing between pandemic and non-pandemic strains was confirmed using clinical isolates from Thailand. Our findings provide valuable insights into the genetic diversity of and establish a reliable method for monitoring pandemic strains.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University (Award JRPRIMD24B8)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MasatomoMorita
  • National BioResource Project (JP)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TetsuyaIida
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP20wm0125006)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TOSHIOKODAMA
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP22wm0125010)
    • Principal Award Recipient: KazuhisaOkada
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP22wm0225023)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TOSHIOKODAMA
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP23fk0108663)
    • Principal Award Recipient: HidemasaIzumiya
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP233fa627004)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TOSHIOKODAMA
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP24fk0108683)
    • Principal Award Recipient: YukihiroAkeda
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001067.v4
2026-02-26
2026-03-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/8/2/acmi001067.v4.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001067.v4&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Shinoda S. Sixty years from the discovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and some recollections. Biocontrol Sci 2011; 16:129–137 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Han C, Tang H, Ren C, Zhu X, Han D. Sero-prevalence and genetic diversity of pandemic V. parahaemolyticus strains occurring at a global scale. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:567 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Dutta B, Takeda Y et al. Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20:39–48 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Hayakawa E, Nishino T, Takeda Y et al. Emergence of a unique O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Calcutta, India, and isolation of strains from the same clonal group from Southeast Asian travelers arriving in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35:3150–3155 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Matsumoto C, Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Iwanaga M, Garg P et al. Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:578–585 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Iida T, Hattori A, Tagomori K, Nasu H, Naim R et al. Filamentous phage associated with recent pandemic strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:477–478 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Okura M, Osawa R, Iguchi A, Takagi M, Arakawa E et al. PCR-based identification of pandemic group Vibrio parahaemolyticus with a novel group-specific primer pair. Microbiol Immunol 2004; 48:787–790 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Williams TL, Musser SM, Nordstrom JL, DePaola A, Monday SR. Identification of a protein biomarker unique to the pandemic O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:1657–1665 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Parthasarathy S, Das SC, Kumar A, Chowdhury G, Miyoshi SI et al. Molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from Indian oyster and their probable implication in food chain. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2021; 37:145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller JJ, Weimer BC, Timme R, Lüdeke CHM, Pettengill JB et al. Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Patterns of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strains from North America Inferred from Whole-Genome Sequence Data. Appl Environ Microbiol 2021; 87:e01403-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang Y, Du Y, Wang H, Tan D, Su A et al. New variant of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, sequence type 3, serotype O10:K4, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:1261–1264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Okada K, Roobthaisong A, Hearn SM, Okada PA, Doung-Ngern P et al. Emergence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O10:K4 in Thailand. Microbiol Immunol 2023; 67:201–203 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang P, Wu X, Ji L, Yan W, Chen L et al. Prevalence and virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Huzhou, China. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:1187 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Makino K, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Yokoyama K, Uda T et al. Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V. cholerae. Lancet 2003; 361:743–749 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 2021; 7:000685 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol 2020; 21:180 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom 2016; 2:e000056 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tonkin-Hill G, Lees JA, Bentley SD, Frost SDW, Corander J. Fast hierarchical Bayesian analysis of population structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:5539–5549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhuiyan NA, Ansaruzzaman M, Kamruzzaman M, Alam K, Chowdhury NR et al. Prevalence of the pandemic genotype of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and significance of its distribution across different serotypes. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:284–286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Murase K, Arakawa E, Izumiya H, Iguchi A, Takemura T et al. Genomic dissection of the Vibrio cholerae O-serogroup global reference strains: reassessing our view of diversity and plasticity between two chromosomes. Microb Genom 2022; 8:mgen000860 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hurley CC, Quirke A, Reen FJ, Boyd EF. Four genomic islands that mark post-1995 pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. BMC Genomics 2006; 7:104 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Espejo RT, García K, Plaza N. Insight into the origin and evolution of the Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:1397 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Velazquez-Roman J, León-Sicairos N, de Jesus Hernández-Díaz L, Canizalez-Roman A. Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 on the American continent. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2014; 3:110 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Han H, Wong H-C, Kan B, Guo Z, Zeng X et al. Genome plasticity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: microevolution of the “pandemic group”. BMC Genom 2008; 9:570 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Guerrero A, Gomez-Gil B, Lizarraga-Partida ML. Genomic stability among O3:K6 V. parahaemolyticus pandemic strains isolated between 1996 to 2012 in American countries. BMC Genom Data 2021; 22:38 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001067.v4
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001067.v4
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error