Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Duplication and segregation of genetic material are vital for cell proliferation. Deletion of DNA replication regulators, such as YabA and ParA, leads to over-initiation of DNA replication. However, the viability of the double mutant suggests additional regulatory mechanisms. Using a transposon mutagenesis library, was identified as a potential candidate. Bioinformatic analysis of suggests that it encodes a putative LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR). LTTRs are established regulators of metabolic processes, leading to the hypothesis that YybE might link metabolic processes to DNA replication. However, under the tested conditions, deletion of did not result in detectable changes to DNA replication frequency, origin segregation or chromosome morphology.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Award BB/S00257X/1)
    • Principal Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001000.v4
2026-01-07
2026-01-23

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/8/1/acmi001000.v4.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001000.v4&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baugh AC, Momany C, Neidle EL. Versatility and complexity: common and uncommon facets of LysR-type transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 2023; 77:317–339 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Maddocks SE, Oyston PCF. Structure and function of the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) family proteins. Microbiology (Reading) 2008; 154:3609–3623 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohannon DE, Sonenshein AL. Positive regulation of glutamate biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 1989; 171:4718–4727 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Frädrich C, March A, Fiege K, Hartmann A, Jahn D et al. The transcription factor AlsR binds and regulates the promoter of the alsSD operon responsible for acetoin formation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 2012; 194:1100–1112 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gunka K, Commichau FM. Control of glutamate homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis: a complex interplay between ammonium assimilation, glutamate biosynthesis and degradation. Mol Microbiol 2012; 85:213–224 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim HJ, Roux A, Sonenshein AL. Direct and indirect roles of CcpA in regulation of Bacillus subtilis krebs cycle genes. Mol Microbiol 2002; 45:179–190 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Murray H, Koh A. Multiple regulatory systems coordinate DNA replication with cell growth in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Noirot-Gros M-F, Dervyn E, Wu LJ, Mervelet P, Errington J et al. An expanded view of bacterial DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:8342–8347 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Noirot-Gros M-F, Velten M, Yoshimura M, McGovern S, Morimoto T et al. Functional dissection of YabA, a negative regulator of DNA replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:2368–2373 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goranov AI, Breier AM, Merrikh H, Grossman AD. YabA of Bacillus subtilis controls DnaA-mediated replication initiation but not the transcriptional response to replication stress. Mol Microbiol 2009; 74:454–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayashi M, Ogura Y, Harry EJ, Ogasawara N, Moriya S. Bacillus subtilis YabA is involved in determining the timing and synchrony of replication initiation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005; 247:73–79 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Merrikh H, Grossman AD. Control of the replication initiator DnaA by an anti-cooperativity factor. Mol Microbiol 2011; 82:434–446 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Scholefield G, Murray H. YabA and DnaD inhibit helix assembly of the DNA replication initiation protein DnaA. Mol Microbiol 2013; 90:147–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Soufo CD, Soufo HJD, Noirot-Gros M-F, Steindorf A, Noirot P et al. Cell-cycle-dependent spatial sequestration of the DnaA replication initiator protein in Bacillus subtilis. Dev Cell 2008; 15:935–941 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Antar H, Soh Y-M, Zamuner S, Bock FP, Anchimiuk A et al. Relief of ParB autoinhibition by parS DNA catalysis and recycling of ParB by CTP hydrolysis promote bacterial centromere assembly. Sci Adv 2021; 7:eabj2854 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ireton K, Gunther NW 4th, Grossman AD. spo0J is required for normal chromosome segregation as well as the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 1994; 176:5320–5329 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jalal AS, Tran NT, Le TB. ParB spreading on DNA requires cytidine triphosphate in vitro. Elife 2020; 9:e53515 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jalal AS, Tran NT, Stevenson CE, Chimthanawala A, Badrinarayanan A et al. A CTP-dependent gating mechanism enables ParB spreading on DNA. Elife 2021; 10:e69676 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Leonard TA, Butler PJG, Löwe J. Structural analysis of the chromosome segregation protein Spo0J from Thermus thermophilus. Mol Microbiol 2004; 53:419–432 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Osorio-Valeriano M, Altegoer F, Das CK, Steinchen W, Panis G et al. The CTPase activity of ParB determines the size and dynamics of prokaryotic DNA partition complexes. Mol Cell 2021; 81:3992–4007 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Osorio-Valeriano M, Altegoer F, Steinchen W, Urban S, Liu Y et al. ParB-type DNA segregation proteins are CTP-dependent molecular switches. Cell 2019; 179:1512–1524 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Soh Y-M, Davidson IF, Zamuner S, Basquin J, Bock FP et al. Self-organization of parS centromeres by the ParB CTP hydrolase. Science 2019; 366:1129–1133 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee PS, Lin DC-H, Moriya S, Grossman AD. Effects of the chromosome partitioning protein Spo0J (ParB) on oriC positioning and replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:1326–1337 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Koh A, Strahl H, Murray H. Regulation of DNA replication initiation by ParA is independent of parS location in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 2022; 168:10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Murray H, Errington J. Dynamic control of the DNA replication initiation protein DnaA by Soj/ParA. Cell 2008; 135:74–84 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ogura Y, Ogasawara N, Harry EJ, Moriya S. Increasing the ratio of Soj to Spo0J promotes replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:6316–6324 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Scholefield G, Whiting R, Errington J, Murray H. Spo0J regulates the oligomeric state of Soj to trigger its switch from an activator to an inhibitor of DNA replication initiation. Mol Microbiol 2011; 79:1089–1100 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Claessen D, Emmins R, Hamoen LW, Daniel RA, Errington J et al. Control of the cell elongation-division cycle by shuttling of PBP1 protein in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 2008; 68:1029–1046 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Le Breton Y, Mohapatra NP, Haldenwang WG. In vivo random mutagenesis of Bacillus subtilis by use of TnYLB-1, a mariner-based transposon. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:327–333 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnson GE, Lalanne J-B, Peters ML, Li G-W. Functionally uncoupled transcription-translation in Bacillus subtilis. Nature 2020; 585:124–128 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Belitsky BR, Janssen PJ, Sonenshein AL. Sites required for GltC-dependent regulation of Bacillus subtilis glutamate synthase expression. J Bacteriol 1995; 177:5686–5695 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Monferrer D, Tralau T, Kertesz MA, Dix I, Solà M et al. Structural studies on the full-length LysR-type regulator TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 reveal a novel open conformation of the tetrameric LTTR fold. Mol Microbiol 2010; 75:1199–1214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Bramhill D, Kornberg A. Duplex opening by dnaA protein at novel sequences in initiation of replication at the origin of the E. coli chromosome. Cell 1988; 52:743–755 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Anagnostopoulos C, Spizizen J. Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 1961; 81:741–746 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hamoen LW, Smits WK, de Jong A, Holsappel S, Kuipers OP. Improving the predictive value of the competence transcription factor (ComK) binding site in Bacillus subtilis using a genomic approach. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:5517–5528 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Blum M, Chang H-Y, Chuguransky S, Grego T, Kandasaamy S et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D344–D354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1236–1240 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pedreira T, Elfmann C, Stülke J. The current state of SubtiWiki, the database for the model organism Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D875–D882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Paysan-Lafosse T, Andreeva A, Blum M, Chuguransky SR, Grego T et al. The Pfam protein families database: embracing AI/ML. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:D523–D534 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M et al. The conserved domain database in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:D384–D388 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D439–D444 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Varadi M, Bertoni D, Magana P, Paramval U, Pidruchna I et al. AlphaFold protein structure database in 2024: providing structure coverage for over 214 million protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:D368–D375 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Bittrich S, Segura J, Duarte JM, Burley SK, Rose Y. RCSB protein data bank: exploring protein 3D similarities via comprehensive structural alignments. Bioinformatics 2024; 40:btae370 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. The UniProt Consortium UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:D609–D617 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, Chay O, Mayrose I et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W344–50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D et al. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003; 19:163–164 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Landau M, Mayrose I, Rosenberg Y, Glaser F, Martz E et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W299–302 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rozewicki J, Li S, Amada KM, Standley DM, Katoh K. MAFFT-DASH: integrated protein sequence and structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W5–W10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Koh A, Murray H. Probing chromosome dynamics in Bacillus subtilis. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1431:91–108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9:676–682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001000.v4
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.001000.v4
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error