Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Experiential learning is the pedagogic foundation of practical laboratory education. This process of learning through experience enables students to develop a deeper understanding of the theoretical material as well as valuable real-world skills. However, there is often a disconnect between the authentic, real-world context of performing laboratory skills and the method of instruction within higher education. This study developed two student laboratory manuals; one which followed a traditionally linear ‘week by week’ format, and another which took inspiration from a publication format and listed the protocols in a distinct ‘methods’ section. The effect the change of layout had on student learning was assessed through analysis of student summative assessment and interaction with the online learning environment. Additionally, the effect on student confidence and perceived technical skills development was assessed through a student survey. The differences in layout resulted in no significant differences in student assessment performance but did result in higher levels of engagement with the online learning environment. The student survey reported an increase in technical confidence (21%) and skill (31%) with the authentic ‘methods’ section layout changes compared to the traditional format. The increase in student engagement, confidence and perceived skill shows that experiential learning benefits from placing the information in an authentic context.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000955.v4
2025-06-17
2025-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/7/6/acmi000955.v4.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000955.v4&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Garnett PJ, Tobin K. Teaching for understanding: exemplary practice in high school chemistry. J Res Sci Teach 1989; 26:1–14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education; 2017 https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566 accessed 5 October 2023
  3. Osika A, MacMahon S, Lodge J, Carroll A. Contextual learning: benefits and examples; 2022 https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/contextual-learning-linking-learning-real-world accessed 5 October 2023
  4. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall; 1984 https://books.google.com/books/about/Experiential_Learning.html?id=o6DfBQAAQBAJ accessed 31 July 2024
  5. Hoover JD, Whitehead CJ. An experiential-cognitive methodology in the first course in management: some preliminary results. In Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference 1975 https://absel-ojs-ttu.tdl.org/absel/article/view/2787 accessed 1 November 2024
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dewey J. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan; 1938 https://philpapers.org/rec/DEWEAE-2 accessed 1 August 2024
  7. Burch GF, Giambatista R, Batchelor JH, Burch JJ, Hoover JD et al. A meta‐analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes. Decision Sci J Innov Edu 2019; 17:239–273 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schreck CM, Weilbach JT, Reitsma GM. Improving graduate attributes by implementing an experiential learning teaching approach: a case study in recreation education. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ 2020; 26:100214 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tomkins L, Ulus E. ‘Oh, was that “experiential learning”?!’ Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb’s learning cycle. Manag Learn 2016; 47:158–178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hajshirmohammadi A. Incorporating experiential learning in engineering courses. IEEE Commun Mag 2017; 55:166–169 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coker JS, Heiser E, Taylor L, Book C. Impacts of experiential learning depth and breadth on student outcomes. J Exp Educ 2017; 40:5–23 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sokhanvar Z, Salehi K, Sokhanvar F. Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: a systematic literature review. Stud Educ Eval 2021; 70:101030 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kreber C, Klampfleitner M, McCune V, Bayne S, Knottenbelt M. What do you mean by “authentic”? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Educ Q 2007; 58:22–43 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer P. The courage to teach. In Exploring the Inner Landscape of a Teacher’s Life San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1998
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lebow DG, Wager WW. Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: implications for emerging instructional technologies. Can J Learn Technol 1994; 23: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown AL, Campione JC. Guided discovery in a community of learners. In Classroom Lessons The MIT Press; 2020 pp 220–261 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Herrington A, Herrington J. What is an authentic learning environment? authentic learning environments in higher education; 20051–13
  18. Sternberg RJ, Wagner RK, Okagaki L. Practical intelligence: the nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In Mechanisms of Everyday Cognition Psychology Press; 2018 pp 205–227
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Delacre M, Lakens D, Leys C. Correction: why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. Int Rev Soc Psychol 2022; 35: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ruxton GD. The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behav Ecol 2006; 17:688–690 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gillett-Swan J, Baroutsis A. Student voice and teacher voice in educational research: a systematic review of 25 years of literature from 1995–2020. Oxf Rev Educ 2024; 50:533–551 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kost RG, de Rosa JC. Impact of survey length and compensation on validity, reliability, and sample characteristics for ultrashort-, short-, and long-research participant perception surveys. J Clin Transl Sci 2018; 2:31–37 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofkens TL, Ruzek E. Measuring student engagement to inform effective interventions in schools. Handbook of student engagement interventions: working with disengaged students; 2019 pp 309–324
  24. Deslauriers L, McCarty LS, Miller K, Callaghan K, Kestin G. Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019; 116:19251–19257 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maya J, Luesia JF, Pérez-Padilla J. The relationship between learning styles and academic performance: consistency among multiple assessment methods in psychology and education students. Sustainability 2021; 13:3341 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu MJ, Zhao K, Fils-Aime F. Response rates of online surveys in published research: a meta-analysis. Comput Hum Behav Rep 2022; 7:100206 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Leslie LL. Are high response rates essential to valid surveys?. Soc Sci Res 1972; 1:323–334 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?. Assess Eval High Educ 2008; 33:301–314 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Parkin H, Heron E. Listening works: using the listening rooms methodology to explore diversity. JLDHE 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schimmer T. The case for confidence. ASCD; 2014 https://ascd.org/el/articles/the-case-for-confidence?form=MG0AV3 accessed 29 October 2024
  31. RMoss K. Confidence: How Winning Streaks and Losing Streaks Begin and End New York: Random House Business; 2004 p 400
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Cooper KM, Downing VR, Brownell SE. The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. Int J Stem Educ 2018; 5:23 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Imawan OR, Ismail R. Student’s self-confidence change through the application of the guided discovery learning model. In 5th International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2021) 2022
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kew SN, Tasir Z, Kew SN, Tasir Z. Learning analytics in online learning environment: a systematic review on the focuses and the types of student-related analytics data. Tech Know Learn 2022; 27:405–427 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Archer M, Morley DA, Souppez J. Real world learning and authentic assessment. Applied pedagogies for higher education: Real world learning and innovation across the curriculum 2020Jan1 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-46951-1_14 accessed 6 August 2024
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ajjawi R, Tai J, Dollinger M, Dawson P, Boud D et al. From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives. Assess Eval High Educ 2024; 49:499–510 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000955.v4
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000955.v4
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error