Skip to content
1887

Access Microbiology open research platform logo Access Microbiology

Volume 7, Issue 4

Opportunities for microbiology citizen science: lessons learnt from three pilot projects Open Access

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) is the partnering of professional scientists and members of the public to answer real-world scientific questions. There has been huge growth in CS over the past two decades, but uptake in microbiology research has, thus far, been relatively limited. In the first part of this article, we discuss how CS is well aligned with microbiology research: sample collection methods can be simplified and used in a variety of environments; projects are expected to appeal to participants as topics are likely to be of relevance to people’s lives and interests, including the health of people and the environment; and projects can also lead to real-world impact, including the identification of new drugs or biotechnological solutions. In the second part of this article, we present our reflections on three pilot projects we have recently completed. In order for the field to grow, people need to share both their successes as well as the challenges they have faced, so that others wanting to use the method can learn from these experiences. We share simplified sampling methods for yeast strains from home brewing and baking, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria on home-grown produce and microbes on chopping boards. However, participation in our projects was limited by a range of factors, including time available and resourcing, which impacted on our ability to generate new knowledge and wider impacts. We provide recommendations for others wishing to run microbiology CS projects, including ensuring appropriate resourcing and considering the ethical implications of projects.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): evaluation , impact and public engagement
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Award BB/W009072/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SarahE West
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Award BB/W008955/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AlanD Goddard
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Award BB/R02152X/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AlanD Goddard
© 2025 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000899.v3
2025-04-16
2025-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/7/4/acmi000899.v3.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000899.v3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Miller-Rushing A, Primack R, Bonney R. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecol Environ 2012; 10:285–290 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper CB, Lewenstein BV. Two meanings of citizen science. RoS: Citizen Sci 2016; 2016:51–62
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Newman G, Wiggins A, Crall A, Graham E, Newman S et al. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecol & Environ 2012; 10:298–304 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Wehn U, Gharesifard M, Ceccaroni L, Joyce H, Ajates R et al. Impact assessment of citizen science: state of the art and guiding principles for a consolidated approach. Sustain Sci 2021; 16:1683–1699 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Pateman RM, West SE. Citizen science: pathways to impact and why participant diversity matters. Citiz Sci Theory Pract 2023; 8:50 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kullenberg C, Kasperowski D. What Is citizen science?--a scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0147152 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Marshall PJ, Lintott CJ, Fletcher LN. Ideas for citizen science in astronomy. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys 2015; 53:247–278 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Wiggins A, Wilbanks J. The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. Am J Bioeth 2019; 19:3–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Timmis K. A road to microbiology literacy (and More): an opportunity for A paradigm change in teaching. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2023; 24:e00019-23 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kieslinger B, Schäfer T, Heigl F, Dörler D, Richter A et al. Evaluating citizen science- towards an open framework. In Citizen Science – Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy UCL Press; 2018 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Porter WT, Wachara J, Barrand ZA, Nieto NC, Salkeld DJ. Citizen science provides an efficient method for broad-scale tick-borne pathogen surveillance of lxodes pacificus and Ixodes scapularis across the United States. mSphere 2021; 6:e0068221 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Landis EA, Oliverio AM, McKenney EA, Nichols LM, Kfoury N et al. The diversity and function of sourdough starter microbiomes. eLife 2021; 10:e61644 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Shelton JMG, Fisher MC, Singer AC. Campaign-based citizen science for environmental mycology: the science solstice and summer soil-stice projects to assess drug resistance in air- and soil-borne Aspergillus fumigatus. Citiz Sci Theory Pract 2020; 5:20
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones NR, Millman C, van der Es M, Hukelova M, Forbes KJ et al. Novel sampling method for assessing human-pathogen interactions in the natural environment using boot socks and citizen scientists, with application to campylobacter seasonality. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017; 83:e00162-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fritz S, See L, Carlson T, Haklay M, Oliver JL et al. Citizen science and the United Nations sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain 2019; 2:922–930 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. McDonald D, Hyde E, Debelius JW, Morton JT, Gonzalez A et al. American gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. mSystems 2018; 3:e00031–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lorimer J, Hodgetts T. Good germs, bad germs: citizen science and microbiology. Biochemist 2017; 39:35–37 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Tweddle JC, Robinson LD, Pocock M, Roy HE. Guide to Citizen Science: Developing, Implementing and Evaluating Citizen Science to Study Biodiversity and the Environment in the UK NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology; 2012
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Microbiology Society What is microbiology?; 2024 https://microbiologysociety.org/why-microbiology-matters/what-is-microbiology.html accessed 26 June 2024
  20. West S, Dyke A, Pateman R. Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citiz Sci 2021; 6:14 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Robinson LD, Cawthray JL, West SE, Bonn A, Ansine J. Ten Principles of Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy UCL Press; 2018 pp 27–40 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. McKenney E, Flythe T, Millis C, Stalls J, Urban JM et al. Symbiosis in the soil: citizen microbiology in middle and high school classrooms. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2016; 17:60–62 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lemon A, Bordenstein SR, Bordenstein SR. Discover the microbes within! The Wolbachia project: citizen science and student-based discoveries for 15 years and counting. Genetics 2020; 216:263–268 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Andrews AM. Assessing the impact of citizen science on motivation, civic awareness, and understanding of the scientific process in a college microbiology synchronous classroom Masters thesis, Montana State University; 2022 https://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17418
  25. Savage AF, Jude BA. Starting small: using microbiology to foster scientific literacy. Trends Microbiol 2014; 22:365–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Seifert VA, Wilson S, Toivonen S, Clarke B, Prunuske A. Community partnership designed to promote lyme disease prevention and engagement in citizen science. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2016; 17:63–69
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Ryan SF, Adamson NL, Aktipis A, Andersen LK, Austin R et al. The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 285:20181977 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Shan J, Jia Y, Hickenbotham P, Teulières L, Clokie MRJ. Combining citizen science and molecular diagnostic methods to investigate the prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in tick pools across Great Britain. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1126498 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. van Tonder AJ, McCullagh F, McKeand H, Thaw S, Bellis K et al. Colonization and transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in schools: a citizen science project. Microb Genom 2023; 9:mgen000993 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Wuyts S, Van Beeck W, Oerlemans EFM, Wittouck S, Claes IJJ et al. Carrot juice fermentations as man-made microbial ecosystems dominated by lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018; 84:e00134-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Reynolds C, Oakden L, West S, Pateman RM, Elliott C. Citizen science and food: A review. UK: Food Standards Agency; 2021
  32. Sauermann H, Vohland K, Antoniou V, Balázs B, Göbel C et al. Citizen science and sustainability transitions. Res Policy 2020; 49:103978 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitchell S, Macmillan A, Morgaine KC, Priest P. Transdisciplinary stakeholder understandings of antimicrobial resistance: An integrative approach in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health 2023; 47:100093 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zinsstag J, Meyer JM, Bonfoh B, Fink G, Dimov A. One Health in human-environment systems: Linking health and the sustainable use of natural resources. CABI One Health 2024 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fritz S, See L, Grey F. The grand challenges facing environmental citizen science. Front Environ Sci 2022; 10:1019628 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fischer H, Cho H, Storksdieck M. Going beyond hooked Participants: the nibble-and-drop framework for classifying citizen science participation. Citiz Sci 2021; 6:10 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanders ER. Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods. J Vis Exp 2012; 63: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Andersson T, Lood R. Pure cultures and streak plating: isolation of single bacterial colonies from a mixed sample.JoVE Science Education Microbiology; 2025 https://app.jove.com/v/10509/pure-cultures-and-streak-plating-isolation-of-bacterial-colonies accessed 4 February 2025
  39. Pocock MJO, Roy HE, Preston CD, Roy DB. The biological records centre: a pioneer of citizen science. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2015; 115:475–493 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Garbarino J, Mason CE. The power of engaging citizen scientists for scientific progress. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2016; 17:7–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Alonso-Del-Real J, Contreras-Ruiz A, Castiglioni GL, Barrio E, Querol A. The Use of Mixed populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii to reduce ethanol content in wine: limited aeration, inoculum proportions, and sequential inoculation. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2087 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lairón-Peris M, Routledge SJ, Linney JA, Alonso-Del-Real J, Spickett CM et al. Lipid composition analysis reveals mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2021; 87:e0044021 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Futurum Careers Biochemistry with Dr Alan Goddard; 2024 https://futurumcareers.com/Alan-Goddard-activity-sheet.pdf accessed 26 June 2024
  44. Megson Using Biology; 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxc3DLASUrw accessed 26 June 2024
  45. Food standards agency Areas of research interest; 2022 https://www.food.gov.uk/print/pdf/node/4386 accessed 26 June 2024
  46. European food safety authority and european centre for disease prevention and control (EFSA and ECDC) The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFS2 2019; 17: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Domingues AR, Pires SM, Halasa T, Hald T. Source attribution of human campylobacteriosis using a meta-analysis of case-control studies of sporadic infections. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 140:970–981 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Domingues AR, Pires SM, Halasa T, Hald T. Source attribution of human salmonellosis using a meta-analysis of case-control studies of sporadic infections. Epidemiol Infect 2012; 140:959–969 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Takooree SD, Motah UD, Lobine D, Ranghoo-Sanmukhiya VM, Neetoo SH. Domestic chopping boards represent important vehicles of microbial food contamination and human pathogens sandhya devi takooree, Usha Devi Motah, Devina Lobine, Vijayant. JFSH 2021 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Møretrø T, Nguyen-The C, Didier P, Maître I, Izsó T et al. Consumer practices and prevalence of Campylobacter, Salmonella and norovirus in kitchens from six European countries. Int J Food Microbiol 2021; 347:109172 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Aston University Office for Students Transparency Information undated; 2023 https://www2.aston.ac.uk/study/transparency-return accessed 19 June 2024
  52. O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations; 2016
  53. Guron GKP, Arango-Argoty G, Zhang L, Pruden A, Ponder MA. Effects of dairy manure-based amendments and soil texture on lettuce- and radish-associated microbiota and resistomes. mSphere 2019; 4:e00239-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Bieri D, Joshi N, Wende W, Kleinschroth F. Increasing demand for urban community gardening before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban For Urban Green 2024; 92:128206 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Public Health England What the public know about antibiotic use and resistance, and how we may influence it: Findings from a 2017 national survey; 2020 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/933982/Capibus_knowledge_and_behaviour_report.pdf accessed 26 June 2024
  56. Pateman RM, Dyke A, West SE. The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citiz Sci Theory Pract 2021; 6:9 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Lin Hunter D, Johnson V, Cooper C. Diversifying large-scale participatory science: the efficacy of engagement through facilitator organizations. Citiz Sci Theory Pract 2023; 8:58 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Oakden L, Gillespie R, Collins A. Citizen Science for Food Standards Challenges: Programme Review. In Food Standards Agency (FSA) and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI); 2023 https://doi.org/10.46756/sci.fsa.vhh726
  59. Hammes F. Editorial Perspectives: using bacteria in rubber ducks to improve scientific literacy, advance citizen science, and expand fundamental science. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 2019; 5:442–443 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Brouwer S, Van der Wielen P, Schriks M, Claassen M, Frijns J. Public participation in science: the future and value of citizen science in the drinking water research. Water 2018; 10:284 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Verran J, Redfern J, Cunliffe A, Romachney A, Wood J. Hands on Biofilm! Utilizing a public audience in a citizen science project to assess yield variability when culturing kombucha pellicle. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2023; 370:fnad073 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000899.v3
Loading
Opportunities for microbiology citizen science: lessons learnt from three pilot projects
Access Microbiology 7, 000899.v3 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000899.v3
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000899.v3
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000899.v3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error