Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Blood culture (BC) investigation remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. However, BC contamination can have clinical implications for the patient, cost implications for service providers and less well-documented, environmental impacts. Efforts to reduce BC contamination are a long-standing theme in quality improvement initiatives in emergency departments (EDs) and hospitals, prompted by hospital costs, healthcare inefficiencies and antimicrobial stewardship efforts. The WHO’s global analysis of healthcare waste in the context of COVID-19 has reported that tens of thousands of tonnes of extra medical waste were produced from the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, basing its estimates on the quantity of personal protective equipment. Additionally, recent literature has also shown increased BC contamination rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of the trend of BC contamination during the COVID-19 pandemic in our institution’s ED. We further discuss some of the potential implications of BC contamination, including potential environmental, economic and efficiency implications.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000897.v3
2025-02-26
2026-02-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/7/2/acmi000897.v3.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000897.v3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CLSI Principles and procedures for blood cultures: approved guideline. https://clsi.org/media/ov4npc4r/m47ed2e_sample.pdf [accessed February 2024]; 2007
  2. Alahmadi YM, Aldeyab MA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Darwish Elhajji FW et al. Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 2011; 77:233–236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sepulveda J, Westblade LF, Whittier S, Satlin MJ, Greendyke WG et al. Bacteremia and blood culture utilization during COVID-19 surge in New York City. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58:8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Uddin MA, Afroj S, Hasan T, Carr C, Novoselov KS et al. Environmental impacts of personal protective clothing used to combat COVID-19. Adv Sustain Syst 2022; 6:2100176 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lamy B, Dargère S, Arendrup MC, Parienti J-J, Tattevin P. How to optimize the use of blood cultures for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections? A State-of-the art. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:697 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, Mirrett S, Reimer LG et al. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24:584–602 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006; 19:788–802 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Alshaikh FS, Godman B, Sindi ON, Seaton RA, Kurdi A. Prevalence of bacterial coinfection and patterns of antibiotics prescribing in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272375 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mckeogh A, Purcell N, Casey K, Fanning C, Doyle M et al. Antimicrobial stewardship and co-infection in covid 19; 2022 https://2022.eccmid.org/abstracts/posters
  10. Sacchetti B, Travis J, Steed LL, Webb G. Effects of COVID-19 on blood culture contamination at a tertiary care academic medical center. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0027722 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lopez JB, Jackson D, Gammie A, Badrick T. Reducing the environmental impact of clinical laboratories. Clin Biochem Rev 2017; 38:3–11 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kenny C, Priyadarshini A. Review of current healthcare waste management methods and their effect on global health. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:284 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clean Technology CentreCork Institute of Technology Reducing waste in irish healthcare facilities, reducing waste in irish healthcare facilities results, guidance, and tips from a waste prevention programme. Cork Green Healthcare; 2014
  14. EASACFEAM Decarbonisation of the health sector: A commentary by EASAC and FEAM. https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Health_Decarb/EASAC_Decarbonisation_of_Health_Sector_Web_9_July_2021.pdf.pdf; 2021
  15. Dempsey C, Skoglund E, Muldrew KL, Garey KW. Economic health care costs of blood culture contamination: a systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2019; 47:963–967 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Souvenir D, Anderson DE Jr, Palpant S, Mroch H, Askin S et al. Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:1923–1926 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Green Healthcare Case study university hospital Galway healthcare risk waste reduction programme. https://greenhealthcare.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Case-Study-University-Hospital-Galway-revised.pdf [accessed March 2024]; 2014
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000897.v3
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000897.v3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error