Genome sequence data for 61 isolates of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris from Brassica crops in Serbia

References

1. Vicente JG, Holub EB. Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops. Mol Plant Pathol 2013; 14:2–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Mansfield J, Genin S, Magori S, Citovsky V, Sriariyanum M et al. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 2012; 13:614–629 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Greer SF, Surendran A, Grant M, Lillywhite R. The current status, challenges, and future perspectives for managing diseases of brassicas. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1209258 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Liu Z, Wang H, Wang J, Lv J, Xie B et al. Physical, chemical, and biological control of black rot of brassicaceae vegetables: a review. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1023826 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Popović T, Balaž J, Starović M, Trkulja N, Ivanović Ž et al. First report of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris as the causal agent of black rot on oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in Serbia. Plant Dis 2013; 97:418 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Prokić A, Marković T, Menković J, Ivanović M, Obradović A. First report of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris causing marginal leaf necrosis of arugula (Eruca vesicaria subsp. Sativa) in Serbia. Plant Dis 2022; 106:1056 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. An S-Q, Potnis N, Dow M, Vorhölter F-J, He Y-Q et al. Mechanistic insights into host adaptation, virulence and epidemiology of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2020; 44:1–32 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Catara V, Cubero J, Pothier JF, Bosis E, Bragard C et al. Trends in molecular diagnosis and diversity studies for phytosanitary regulated Xanthomonas. Microorganisms 2021; 9:862 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Jacques M-A, Arlat M, Boulanger A, Boureau T, Carrère S et al. Using ecology, physiology, and genomics to understand host specificity in Xanthomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2016; 54:163–187 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Popović T, Mitrović P, Jelušić A, Dimkić I, Marjanović‐Jeromela A et al. Genetic diversity and virulence of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris isolates from Brassica napus and six Brassica oleracea crops in Serbia. Plant Pathol 2019; 68:1448–1457 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Timilsina S, Potnis N, Newberry EA, Liyanapathiranage P, Iruegas-Bocardo F et al. Xanthomonas diversity, virulence and plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18:415–427 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Li Q, Wang B, Yu J, Dou D. Pathogen‐informed breeding for crop disease resistance. JIPB 2021; 63:305–311 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Vleeshouwers VGAA, Raffaele S, Vossen JH, Champouret N, Oliva R et al. Understanding and exploiting late blight resistance in the age of effectors. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2011; 49:507–531 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Rasmussen DA, Grünwald NJ. Phylogeographic approaches to characterize the emergence of plant pathogens. Phytopathology 2021; 111:68–77 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Baldi P, La Porta N. Molecular approaches for low-cost point-of-care pathogen detection in agriculture and forestry. Front Plant Sci 2020; 11:570862 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Martin RR, Constable F, Tzanetakis IE. Quarantine regulations and the impact of modern detection methods. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2016; 54:189–205 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jelušić A, Berić T, Mitrović P, Dimkić I, Stanković S et al. New insights into the genetic diversity of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris isolates from winter oilseed rape in Serbia. Plant Pathol 2021; 70:35–49 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Popovic T, Jelusic A, Mitrovic P, Ilicic R, Markovic S. Allelic profile of Serbian Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris isolates from cabbage. Pesticidi I Fitomedicina 2020; 35:19–26 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Taylor JD, Conway J, Roberts SJ, Astley D, Vicente JG. Sources and origin of resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in brassica genomes. Phytopathology 2002; 92:105–111 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Vicente JG, Conway J, Roberts SJ, Taylor JD. Identification and origin of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races and related pathovars. Phytopathology 2001; 91:492–499 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 1954; 44:301–307
    [Google Scholar]
22. Harrison J, Hussain RMF, Greer SF, Ntoukakis V, Aspin A et al. Draft genome sequences for ten strains of Xanthomonas species that have phylogenomic importance. Access Microbiol 2023; 5:000532 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Krueger F. Babraham Bioinformatics - Trim Galore!; 2020 http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/ accessed 14 July 2020
24. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 2011; 17:10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
27. Benson DA. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 33:D34–D38 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D20–D26 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
30. Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 2023; 20:1203–1212 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
31. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genom Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shakya M, Ahmed SA, Davenport KW, Flynn MC, Lo C-C et al. Standardized phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analysis applied to species across the microbial tree of life. Sci Rep 2020; 10:1723 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
33. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tavaré S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences; 1986 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:82212051
35. Roux B, Bolot S, Guy E, Denancé N, Lautier M et al. Genomics and transcriptomics of Xanthomonas campestris species challenge the concept of core type III effectome. BMC Genom 2015; 16:975 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
36. Young JM, Bull CT, Boer SH, Firrao G, Saddler GE et al. Names of plant pathogenic bacteria, 1864 – 2004. Rev Plant Pathol 2004; 75:721–763
    [Google Scholar]
37. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
39. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
40. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W484–W492 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:1009–1010 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
42. Bellenot C, Carrère S, Gris C, Noël LD, Arlat M. Genome sequences of 17 strains from eight races of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Microbiol Resour Announc 2022; 11:e0027922 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
43. Guy E, Genissel A, Hajri A, Chabannes M, David P et al. Natural genetic variation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris pathogenicity on arabidopsis revealed by association and reverse genetics. mBio 2013; 4:e00538-12 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rodríguez-Beltrán J, DelaFuente J, León-Sampedro R, MacLean RC, San Millán Á. Beyond horizontal gene transfer: the role of plasmids in bacterial evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021; 19:347–359 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
45. Roman-Reyna V, Sharma A, Toth H, Konkel Z, Omiotek N et al. Live tracking of a plant pathogen outbreak reveals rapid and successive, multidecade plasmid reduction. mSystems 2024; 9:e0079523 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
46. Dubrow ZE, Carpenter SCD, Carter ME, Grinage A, Gris C et al. Cruciferous weed isolates of Xanthomonas campestris yield insight into pathovar genomic relationships and genetic determinants of host and tissue specificity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2022; 35:791–802 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
47. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:1072–1075 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
48. da Silva ACR, Ferro JA, Reinach FC, Farah CS, Furlan LR et al. Comparison of the genomes of two Xanthomonas pathogens with differing host specificities. Nature 2002; 417:459–463 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]