Skip to content
1887

Access Microbiology open research platform logo Access Microbiology

Volume 6, Issue 6

Using photovoice to engage students in a non-major microbiology course Open Access

Abstract

In the past decade, it has become increasingly difficult to engage and encourage critical thinking and deeper learning in students who participate in higher education, particularly in non-major subjects. Photovoice is a participatory action research methodology that has been used in community-based research in many different areas including social science, health science and education. In this study, photovoice was used as a pedagogical tool in a third-year BSc Bioscience non-major microbiology module at Dundalk Institute of Technology. In order to ascertain if photovoice was an effective way of engaging these students, a qualitative descriptive methodological approach, in the form of a focus group, was employed. Six of the 13 students who took the module participated in the focus group, reporting a positive experience overall of using photovoice. Further analysis of the focus group data resulted in the overarching theme of choice, with creativity and critical thinking and research skills as sub-themes to emerge. These findings suggest that photovoice is an effective way to engage students in microbiology as a non-major subject. However, as it was a small sample size, future research would need to use a larger cohort of students to provide further evidence of using photovoice as a pedagogical engagement tool for non-major subjects.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): creativity , microbiology , non-major subject , photovoice and science
© 2024 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000784.v3
2024-06-26
2025-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/6/6/acmi000784.v3.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000784.v3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Burks TN. Improving student attitudes and academic performance in introductory biology using a project-based learning community. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2022; 23:e00216-21 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Federici S. Developing Customised computer science courses for non-major students in Informatics, computer science, or media: a case study on health psychologists: teaching Informatics, computer science and media to the psychologists of health. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Media and Mass Communication 2023 pp 20–38
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Marchisio M, Remogna S, Roman F, Sacchet M. Teaching mathematics to non-mathematics majors through problem solving and new technologies. Educ Sci 2022; 12:34 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bromage A, Pierce S, Reader T, Compton L. Teaching statistics to non-specialists: challenges and strategies for success. J Furth High Educ 2022; 46:46–61 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Gormally C. Using comics to make science come alive. CourseSource 2020; 7: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Strong MT, Cook T, Belet LA, Calarco P. Changing the world: how comics and graphic novels can shift teaching. Hum Soc 2023; 47:245–257 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Akcanca N. An alternative teaching tool in science education: educational comics. Int Online J Educ Teach 2020; 7:1550–1570
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Scavone P, Carrasco V, Umpiérrez A, Morel M, Arredondo D et al. Microbiology can be comic. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2019; 366:fnz171 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Mullen Davis MA, Allen K. Writing children’s books to increase engagement in non-major introductory chemistry courses. J Chem Educ 2023; 100:2446–2450 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gleason BL, Peeters MJ, Resman-Targoff BH, Karr S, McBane S et al. An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ 2011; 75:186 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Hernández-de-Menéndez M, Vallejo Guevara A, Tudón Martínez JC, Hernández Alcántara D, Morales-Menendez R. Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. Int J Interact Des Manuf 2019; 13:909–922 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ribeiro-Silva E, Amorim C, Aparicio-Herguedas JL, Batista P. Trends of active learning in higher education and students’ well-being: a literature review. Front Psychol 2022; 13:844236 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fass MF. Teaching emerging diseases: a strategy for succeeding with nonmajors. Microbiol Educ 2000; 1:20–25 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bull H, Premkumar K, Acharibasam JW. Using an innovative intervention to promote active learning in an introductory microbiology course. Can J Scholarsh Teach Learn 2020; 11: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang C, Burris MA. Empowerment through photo novella: portraits of participation. Health Educ Q 1994; 21:171–186 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Liebenberg L. Thinking critically about photovoice: achieving empowerment and social change. Int J Qual Methods 2018; 17:1–9 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. John ME, Samson-Akpan PE. Using photovoice as a student-centred teaching method among graduate nursing students: a mixed method study. Nur Primary Care 2021; 5:1–6 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Latz AO, Mulvihill TM. Photovoice Research in Education and Beyond: A Practical Guide from Theory to Exhibition New York: Routledge; 2017 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Whitfield D, Meyer H. Learning from our students: photovoice and classroom action research. Sci Educ Rev 2005; 4:97–103
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cook K, Quigley CF. Connecting to our community: utilizing photovoice as a pedagogical tool to connect college students to science. Int J Environ Sci Educ 2013; 8:339–357 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Waters C, Cook K. Designing environmental science curriculum with photoVoice to engage nonscience majors. J Coll Sci Teach 2020; 49:28–35 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Stroud MW. Research and teaching: photovoice as a pedagogical tool: student engagement in undergraduate introductory chemistry for nonscience majors. J Coll Sci Teach 2014; 043:98–107 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Walter KO, Baller SL, Kuntz AM. Two approaches for using web sharing and photography assignments to increase critical thinking in the health sciences. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 2012; 24:283–394
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Haultain A. Picture proposal: planning for the interactive use of photos in the higher education classroom. In International Conference on Language, Education, Humanities and Innovation, 22-23 April 2017, Singapore 2017 https://icsai.org/procarch/6iclehi/6iclehi-032.pdf accessed 6 February 2022
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hancock B, Ockleford E, Windridge K. An Introduction to Qualitative Research London: Trent focus group; 2001
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Leung FH, Savithiri R. Spotlight on focus groups. Can Fam Physician 2009; 55:218–219 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Haffejee F. The use of photovoice to transform health science students into critical thinkers. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21:237 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3:77–101 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Maguire M, Delahunt B. Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland J High Educ 2017; 9:3351–33514
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant 2022; 56:1391–1412 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pretorius L, Mourik GP, Barratt C. Student choice and higher-order thinking: using a novel flexible assessment regime combined with critical thinking activities to encourage the development of higher order thinking. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 2017; 29:389–401
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Biernacki PJ. Assessing the options: considerations for provision of choice in assessment. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium; 2022 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED627197.pdf accessed 1 August 2023
  33. Lasley EB. Giving students a choice in assignments can boost creativity and motivation. Faculty Focus 20131–7
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Beghetto RA. There is no creativity without uncertainty: Dubito Ergo Creo. J Creat 2021; 31:100005 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jackson N. Tackling the wicked problem of creativity in higher education. In: Background paper for a presentation at the ARC centre for the creative industries and innovation, international conference, June 2008, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 2008 http://imaginativecurriculumnetwork.pbworks.com/f/WICKED+PROBLEM+OF+CREATIVITY+IN+HIGHER+EDUCATION.pdf accessed 2 February 2022
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000784.v3
Loading
Using photovoice to engage students in a non-major microbiology course
Access Microbiology 6, 000784.v3 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000784.v3
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000784.v3
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000784.v3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error