Skip to content
1887

Abstract

In this comparative case study, we discuss clinically relevant discrepancies of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) interpretation for ceftriaxone against a non-typable, beta-lactamase negative, ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) isolated from a blood culture.

A 74-year-old man presented with a 3 day illness characterized by shortness of breath and dry cough, and was noted to be febrile and hypoxic on admission. A blood culture bottle flagged positive with Gram-negative coccobacilli, later identified as with the patient commenced on ceftriaxone. The isolate was beta-lactamase negative and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) using disc diffusion revealed the isolate resistant to ceftriaxone and ampicillin by EUCAST methodology, with the patient subsequently changed to amoxicillin/clavulanate. Further AST using the CLSI methodology in parallel demonstrated discrepant results between the two susceptibility methods. The patient recovered without complications.

This discrepancy could lead to inconsistent reporting of susceptibilities between laboratories, and consequently antibiotic prescribing, especially for invasive isolates. As more laboratories adopt EUCAST methodologies for AST interpretation in Australia and globally, it is important for clinicians to consider the clinical implications of these methodological discrepancies.

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000578.v4
2023-10-09
2026-04-18

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/5/10/acmi000578.v4.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000578.v4&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic (Version 16.1); 2021 https://tgldcdp.tg.org.au.acs.hcn.com.au/etgAccess
  2. Tristram S, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC. Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20:368–389 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Merlino J, Siarakas S. Antibiotic prescribing and antimicrobial resistance from an Australian perspective. Microb Drug Resist 2022; 28:536–538 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters (Version 12.0); 2022 http://www.eucast.org
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CSLI) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, twenty-third informational supplement. In CLSI Document M100-S31 Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernando SA, Pang S, McKew GL, Phan T, Merlino J et al. Evaluation of the Haemophilus influenzae EUCAST and CLSI disc diffusion methods to recognize aminopenicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:2594–2598 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Thomas E, Guillouzouic A, Juvin M-E, Chene A-L, Caillon J et al. Prevalence of Haemophilus influenzae with alteration of PBP 3 sequence over a 1-year period in a French hospital: focus on a clinical failure after ceftriaxone treatment. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 93:89–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deghmane A-E, Hong E, Chehboub S, Terrade A, Falguières M et al. High diversity of invasive Haemophilus influenzae isolates in France and the emergence of resistance to third generation cephalosporins by alteration of ftsI gene. J Infect 2019; 79:7–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. García-Cobos S, Campos J, Lázaro E, Román F, Cercenado E et al. Ampicillin-resistant non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae in Spain: recent emergence of clonal isolates with increased resistance to cefotaxime and cefixime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:2564–2573 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. García-Cobos S, Arroyo M, Pérez-Vázquez M, Aracil B, Oteo J et al. Evaluation of the EUCAST disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for Haemophilus influenzae based on the resistance mechanism to β-lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013; 68:159–163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Skaare D, Anthonisen IL, Kahlmeter G, Matuschek E, Natås OB et al. Emergence of clonally related multidrug resistant Haemophilus influenzae with penicillin-binding protein 3-mediated resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, Norway, 2006 to 2013. Euro Surveill 2014; 19:20986 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Skaare D, Anthonisen IL, Caugant DA, Jenkins A, Steinbakk M et al. Multilocus sequence typing and ftsI sequencing: a powerful tool for surveillance of penicillin-binding protein 3-mediated beta-lactam resistance in nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. BMC Microbiol 2014; 14:131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nishimura Y, Hagiya H, Kawano K, Yokota Y, Oka K et al. Invasive non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae infection due to endometritis associated with adenomyosis. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:521 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Marchese A, Esposito S, Barbieri R, Bassetti M, Debbia E. Does the adoption of EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints affect the selection of antimicrobials to treat acute community-acquired respiratory tract infections?. BMC Infect Dis 2012; 12:181–189 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meylan S, Guery B. In the name of common sense: EUCAST breakpoints and potential pitfalls. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26:1593–1594 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nürnberg S, Claus H, Krone M, Vogel U, Lâm T-T. Cefotaxime resistance in invasive Haemophilus influenzae isolates in Germany 2016-19: prevalence, epidemiology and relevance of PBP3 substitutions. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:920–929 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000578.v4
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000578.v4
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error