Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Culture is the gold-standard diagnosis for urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, most hospitals in low-resource countries lack adequately equipped laboratories and relevant expertise to perform culture and, therefore, rely heavily on dipstick tests for UTI diagnosis.

In many Kenyan hospitals, routine evaluations are rarely done to assess the accuracy of popular screening tests such as the dipstick test. As such, there is a substantial risk of misdiagnosis emanating from inaccuracy in proxy screening tests. This may result in misuse, under-use or over-use of antimicrobials.

The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of the urine dipstick test as a proxy for the diagnosis of UTIs in selected Kenyan hospitals.

A hospital-based cross-sectional method was used. The utility of dipstick in the diagnosis of UTIs was assessed using midstream urine against culture as the gold standard.

The dipstick test predicted 1416 positive UTIs, but only 1027 were confirmed positive by culture, translating to a prevalence of 54.1 %. The sensitivity of the dipstick test was better when leucocytes and nitrite tests were combined (63.1 %) than when the two tests were separate (62.6 and 50.7 %, respectively). Similarly, the two tests combined had a better positive predictive value (87.0 %) than either test alone. The nitrite test had the best specificity (89.8 %) and negative predictive value (97.4 %) than leucocytes esterase (L.E) or both tests combined. In addition, sensitivity in samples from inpatients (69.2 %) was higher than from outpatients (62.7 %). Furthermore, the dipstick test had a better sensitivity and positive predictive value among female (66.0 and 88.6 %) than male patients (44.3 and 73.9 %). Among the various patient age groups, the dipstick test’s sensitivity and positive predictive value were exceptionally high in patients ≥75 years old (87.5 and 93.3 %).

Discrepancies in prevalence from the urine dipstick test and culture, the gold standard, indicate dipstick test inadequacy for accurate UTI diagnosis. The finding also demonstrates the need for urine culture for accurate UTI diagnosis. However, considering it is not always possible to perform a culture, especially in low-resource settings, future studies are needed to combine specific UTI symptoms and dipstick results to assess possible increases in the test’s sensitivity. There is also a need to develop readily available and affordable algorithms that can detect UTIs where culture is not available.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Medical Research Council - UK (Award MR/S004785/1)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MatthewHolden
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000483.v3
2023-06-14
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/acmi/5/6/acmi000483.v3.html?itemId=/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000483.v3&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Majumder MMI, Mahadi AR, Ahmed T, Ahmed M, Uddin MN et al. Antibiotic resistance pattern of microorganisms causing urinary tract infection: a 10-year comparative analysis in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022; 11:156 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dacombe R, Bates I, Bhardwaj M, Wallis S, Pulford J. Fleming fund: supporting surveillance capacity for antimicrobial resistance an analysis of approaches to laboratory capacity strengthening for drug resistant infections in low and middle income countries. n.d
  3. Murgia L et al. Management of urinary tract infections: problems and possible solutions. In Urinary Tract Infection - The Result of the Strength of the Pathogen, or the Weakness of the Host 2017 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fernandes DJ, D. JM, Castelino DN. Utility of dipstick test (nitrite and leukocyte esterase) and microscopic analysis of urine when compared to culture in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children. Int J Contemp Pediatr 2017; 5:156 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fan S-L, Bai S. Urinalysis. In Contemporary Practice in Clinical Chemistry 2020 pp 665–680 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dadzie I, Quansah E, Puopelle Dakorah M, Abiade V, Takyi-Amuah E et al. The effectiveness of dipstick for the detection of urinary tract infection. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2019; 2019:8642628 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lai H-C, Chang S-N, Lin H-C, Hsu Y-L, Wei H-M et al. Association between urine pH and common uropathogens in children with urinary tract infections. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2021; 54:290–298 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen C-Y, Chen Y-H, Lu P-L, Lin W-R, Chen T-C et al. Proteus mirabilis urinary tract infection and bacteremia: risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2012; 45:228–236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Primack W, Bukowski T, Sutherland R, Gravens-Mueller L, Carpenter M. What urinary colony count indicates a urinary tract infection in children?. J Pediatr 2017; 191:259–261 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhansali AJ, Inbaraj LR, George CE, Norman G. Can urine dipstick test be an alternative to detect urinary tract infection in limited resource setting? - A validity study from Bangalore, India. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9:561–566 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bafna P, Deepanjali S, Mandal J, Balamurugan N, Swaminathan RP et al. Reevaluating the true diagnostic accuracy of dipstick tests to diagnose urinary tract infection using Bayesian latent class analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244870 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bellazreg F, Abid M, Lasfar NB, Hattab Z, Hachfi W et al. Diagnostic value of dipstick test in adult symptomatic urinary tract infections: results of a cross-sectional Tunisian study. Pan Afr Med J 2019; 33:131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coulthard MG. Using urine nitrite sticks to test for urinary tract infection in children aged < 2 years: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2019; 34:1283–1288 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mahyar A, Ayazi P, Froozesh M, Daneshi-Kohan M-M, Barikani A. Can urinary nitrite results be used to conduct antimicrobial option for urinary tract infection in children?. Iran J Pediatr 2012; 22:237–240 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Prah JK, Amoah S, Ocansey DWK, Arthur R, Walker E et al. Evaluation of urinalysis parameters and antimicrobial susceptibility of uropathogens among out-patients at University of Cape Coast Hospital. Ghana Med J 2019; 53:44–51 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Suresh J, Krishnamurthy S, Mandal J, Mondal N, Sivamurukan P. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care nitrite and leukocyte esterase dipstick test for the screening of pediatric urinary tract infections. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2021; 32:703–710 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mohanna AT, Alshamrani KM, SaemAldahar MA, Kidwai AO, Kaneetah AH et al. The sensitivity and specificity of white blood cells and nitrite in dipstick urinalysis in association with urine culture in detecting infection in adults From October 2016 to October 2019 at King Abdulaziz Medical City. Cureus 2021; 13:e15436 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bacârea A, Fekete GL, Grigorescu BL, Bacârea VC. Discrepancy in results between dipstick urinalysis and urine sediment microscopy. Exp Ther Med 2021; 21:538 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rousham E, Cooper M, Petherick E, Saukko P, Oppenheim B. Overprescribing antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in older adults: a case series review of admissions in two UK hospitals. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8:71 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Biggel M, Heytens S, Latour K, Bruyndonckx R, Goossens H et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in older adults: the most fragile women are prone to long-term colonization. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:170 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Joseph A. The diagnosis and management of UTI in >65s: to dipstick or not? The argument against dipsticks. Infect Prev Pract 2020; 2:100063 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Coulthard MG. Using urine nitrite sticks to test for urinary tract infection in children aged < 2 years: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2019; 34:1283–1288 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Middelkoop SJM, van Pelt LJ, Kampinga GA, Ter Maaten JC, Stegeman CA. Influence of gender on the performance of urine dipstick and automated urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections at the emergency department. Eur J Intern Med 2021; 87:44–50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mambatta AK, Jayarajan J, Rashme VL, Harini S, Menon S et al. Reliability of dipstick assay in predicting urinary tract infection. J Family Med Prim Care 2015; 4:265–268 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernandes DJ, D. JM, Castelino DN. Utility of dipstick test (nitrite and leukocyte esterase) and microscopic analysis of urine when compared to culture in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children. Int J Contemp Pediatr 2017; 5:156 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Behzadi P, Behzadi E, Pawlak-Adamska EA. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) or genital tract infections (GTIs)? It’s the diagnostics that count. GMS Hyg Infect Control 2019; 14:Doc14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000483.v3
Loading
/content/journal/acmi/10.1099/acmi.0.000483.v3
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error