Reports of false-negative quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) results from patients with high clinical suspension for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), suggested that a negative result produced by a nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAs) did not always exclude the possibility of COVID-19 infection. Repeat testing has been used by clinicians as a strategy in an to attempt to improve laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 and overcome false-negative results in particular.

To investigate whether repeat testing is helpful for overcoming false-negative results.

We retrospectively reviewed our experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, focusing on the yield of repeat patient testing for improving SARS-CoV-2 detection by NAA.

We found that the yield from using repeat testing to identify false-negative patients was low. When the first test produced a negative result, only 6 % of patients tested positive by the second test. The yield decreased to 1.7 and then 0 % after the third and fourth tests, respectively. When comparing the results produced by three assays, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) SARS CoV-2 RT-qPCR panel, Xpert Xpress CoV-2 and ID NOW COVID-19, the ID NOW assay was associated with the highest number of patients who tested negative initially but positive on repeat testing. The CDC SARS CoV-2 RT-qPCR panel produced the highest number of indeterminate results. Repeat testing resolved more than 90 % of indeterminate/invalid results.

The yield from using repeat testing to identify false-negative patients was low. Repeat testing was best used for resolving indeterminate/invalid results.

This study was supported by the:
  • Feinberg School of Medicine
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Lu X, Wang L, Sakthivel SK, Whitaker B, Murray J et al. US CDC real-time reverse transcription PCR panel for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang Yang MY, Shen C, Wang F, Yuan J, Li J et al. Evaluating the accuracy of different respiratory specimens in the laboratory diagnosis and monitoring the viral shedding of 2019-nCoV infections. MedRxiv The Preprint Server for Health Sciences 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao J, Yuan Q, Wang H, Liu W, Liao X et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jang S, Rhee JY, YM W, Jung BK. Viral Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 over the preclinical, clinical, and postclinical period. Int J Infect Dis 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shen Z, Xiao Y, Kang L, Ma W, Shi L et al. Genomic diversity of SARS-COV-2 in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Clin Infect Dis 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Phan T. Genetic diversity and evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Infect Genet Evol 2020; 81:104260 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Y, Kang H, Liu X, Tong Z. Combination of RT-qPCR testing and clinical features for diagnosis of COVID-19 facilitates management of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. J Med Virol 2020; 92:538–539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H et al. SARS-COV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1177–1179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, Poon LLM, Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20:411–412 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhen W, Smith E, Manji R, Schron D, Berry GJ. Clinical evaluation of three sample-to-answer platforms for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang Y, Chen S, Yang Z, Guan W, Liu D et al. SARS-COV-2 viral load in clinical samples from critically Ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201:1435–1438 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error