1887
Table 1.

Corrected list of names of phyla to be considered for validation after approval of the proposal to include the rank of phylum in the ICNP. This list is based on Table 1 in [ ]

cannot be used as the name of the class as it is on the list of nomina rejicienda (Opinion 79). Instead we propose
Note that no nomenclatural type has been designated for the class
As the name is widely used for the phylum, the Judicial Commission may consider conserving this name (earlier used for a class) instead of
We propose establishing the class as the nomenclatural type
As the name is widely used for the phylum, the Judicial Commission may consider conserving this name instead of
cannot be used as the name of the class as it is on the list of nomina rejicienda (Opinion 79). Instead we propose
Deinococcus-Thermus
As the name is widely used for the phylum, the Judicial Commission may consider conserving this name instead of
Note that no nomenclatural type has been designated for the class
As the name is widely used for the phylum, the Judicial Commission may consider conserving this name instead of
We propose establishing the class as the nomenclatural type
cannot be used as the name of the class as it is on the list of nomina rejicienda (Opinion 79). Instead we propose
cannot be used as the name of the class as it is on the list of nomina rejicienda (Opinion 79). Instead we propose
cannot be used as the name of the class as it is on the list of nomina rejicienda (Opinion 79). Instead we propose .

As the name is widely used for the phylum, the Judicial Commission may consider conserving this name instead of
Table 1. Corrected list of names of phyla to be considered for validation after approval of the proposal to include the rank of phylum in the ICNP. This list is based on Table 1 in [ ]
Citation:
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error