1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 74, Issue 5

sp. nov., isolated from rice paddy soil No Access

Abstract

An aerobic, Gram-stain-negative and short rod-shaped bacterial strain, designated M6-31, was isolated from rice paddy soil sampled in Miryang, Republic of Korea. Growth was observed at 4–35 °C (optimum, 28 °C), pH 6.0–9.0 (optimum, pH 7.0–8.0) and in the presence of 0–4 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 0 % w/v). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences grouped strain M6-31 with IBFC2009, SCU-B140 and MLS-26-JM13-11 in the same clade, with the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities ranging from 95.8 to 96.6 %. A genome-based phylogenetic tree reconstructed by using all publicly available genomes placed strain M6-31 with KACC 22910, ‘’ ACCC 05744, CGMCC 1.12966 and CGMCC 1.12801. Orthologous average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain M6-31 and its closely related strains were lower than 74.6 and 22.0 %, respectively. The respiratory quinone was menaquinone-7, and the major polar lipid was phosphatidylethanolamine. The major fatty acids (>10 %) were C iso, C iso 3OH and summed feature 3. The phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic data obtained in this study showed that strain M6-31 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. (type strain M6-31=KACC 22765=JCM 35893) is proposed.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): new species , rice paddy soil and Sphingobacterium oryzagri sp. nov.
© 2024 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006371
2024-05-07
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Yabuuchi E, Kaneko T, Yano I, Moss CW, Miyoshi N. Sphingobacterium gen. nov., Sphingobacterium spiritivorum comb. nov., Sphingobacterium multivorum comb. nov., Sphingobacterium mizutae sp. nov., and Flavobacterium indologenes sp. nov.: glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods in CDC groups IIK-2 and IIb. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1983; 33:580–598 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Wauters G, Janssens M, De Baere T, Vaneechoutte M, Deschaght P. Isolates belonging to CDC group II-i belong predominantly to Sphingobacterium mizutaii Yabuuchi et al. 1983: emended descriptions of S. mizutaii and of the genus Sphingobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2598–2601 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang M, Li A, Xu S, Chen M, Yao Q et al. Sphingobacterium micropteri sp. nov. and Sphingobacterium litopenaei sp. nov., isolated from aquaculture water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:ijsem [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Lai W-A, Hameed A, Liu Y-C, Hsu Y-H, Lin S-Y et al. Sphingobacterium cibi sp. nov., isolated from the food-waste compost and emended descriptions of Sphingobacterium spiritivorum (Holmes et al. 1982) Yabuuchi et al. 1983 and Sphingobacteriumthermophilum Yabe et al. 2013. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5336–5344 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Niu X, Cui W, Cui M, Zhang X, Zhang S et al. Sphingobacterium solani sp. nov., isolated from potato stems. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1012–1017 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmidt VSJ, Wenning M, Scherer S. Sphingobacterium lactis sp. nov. and Sphingobacterium alimentarium sp. nov., isolated from raw milk and a dairy environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1506–1511 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmed I, Ehsan M, Sin Y, Paek J, Khalid N et al. Sphingobacterium pakistanensis sp. nov., a novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from rhizosphere of Vigna mungo. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:325–333 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu Y-S, Hussain F, Habib N, Khan IU, Chu X et al. Sphingobacterium soli sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2284–2288 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee Y, Jin HM, Jung HS, Jeon CO. Sphingobacterium humi sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4632–4638 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Matsuyama H, Katoh H, Ohkushi T, Satoh A, Kawahara K et al. Sphingobacterium kitahiroshimense sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1576–1579 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Yuan L. Development of hybrid rice to ensure food security. Rice Sci 2014; 21:1–2 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Jeong O-Y, Park H-S, Baek M-K, Kim W-J, Lee G-M et al. Review of rice in Korea: current status, future prospects, and comparisons with rice in other countries. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 2021; 24:1–11 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishii S, Ikeda S, Minamisawa K, Senoo K. Nitrogen cycling in rice paddy environments: past achievements and future challenges. Microbes Environ 2011; 26:282–292 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Qiu Z, Li M, Song L, Wang C, Yang S et al. Study on nitrogen-retaining microbial agent to reduce nitrogen loss during chicken manure composting and nitrogen transformation mechanism. J Clean Prod 2021; 285:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Huq MA, Akter S. Characterization and genome analysis of Arthrobacter bangladeshi sp. nov., applied for the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial efficacy against drug-resistant human pathogens. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:1691 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeon Y, Lee S-S, Chung BS, Kim JM, Bae J-W et al. Mucilaginibacter oryzae sp. nov., isolated from soil of a rice paddy. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1451–1454 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Yu Z, Chang M, Wu M, Yang G, Zhou S et al. Pseudomonas oryzae sp. nov. isolated from a paddy soil in South China. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:815–822 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Xie CH, Yokota A. Zoogloea oryzae sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from rice paddy soil, and reclassification of the strain ATCC 19623 as Crabtreella saccharophila gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:619–624 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics vol 1991 New York: Wiley; pp 115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:512–526 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hufnagel DE, Hufford MB, Seetharam AS. SequelTools: a suite of tools for working with PacBio Sequel raw sequence data. BMC Bioinformatics 2020; 21:429 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W95–W101 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson LS, Eddy SR, Portugaly E. Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:431 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL et al. KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:566–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang Y, Coleman-Derr D, Chen G, Gu YQ. OrthoVenn: a web server for genome wide comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:W78–W84 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Golding CG, Lamboo LL, Beniac DR, Booth TF. The scanning electron microscope in microbiology and diagnosis of infectious disease. Sci Rep 2016; 6:26516 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Atlas RM. Handbook of Microbiological Media CRC Press; 2004 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Smibert RM. Phenotypic characteization. Methods Gen Mol Bacteriol 1994; 607:654
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC Newsl 1990; 20:1–6
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006371
Loading
Sphingobacterium oryzagri sp. nov., isolated from rice paddy soil
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 74, 006371 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006371
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006371
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006371
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error